Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
And now rep is finally broken. I have topped out at 16384 - it has not gone up for over a week now. 2 to the power of 14 - which is a slightly odd 2 power. I expected 65536.
Who "coded" this pile of poo? Was it done for much cheapness?
It's a bit like when you buy a hard drive that says 720mbyte on it, but there's only actually 680.
And now rep is finally broken. I have topped out at 16384 - it has not gone up for over a week now. 2 to the power of 14 - which is a slightly odd 2 power. I expected 65536.
Who "coded" this pile of poo? Was it done for much cheapness?
As lovely as Cojak
As rich as Dimprawn
As witty as Marillionfan
As technical as Fitzy
As drivelly as Zeitghost
As inventive as Threaded
0
As invisible as Space Cadet
-ve
As gormless as Churchill
As insulting as Minestrone
As cretinous as Sasguru
As annoying as Andyw
And now rep is finally broken. I have topped out at 16384 - it has not gone up for over a week now. 2 to the power of 14 - which is a slightly odd 2 power. I expected 65536.
Who "coded" this pile of poo? Was it done for much cheapness?
Leave a comment: