I would find a struggling bank, see all the sad faces on bankers with empty pockets and suits from Burtons, and bail it out immediately.
It's only fair.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: What would you do with £97 billion?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What would you do with £97 billion?"
Collapse
-
Or you could hire Sasgurus mum until the end of time!Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostI'd spend it on a hareem of ridiculously expensive hookers.
Leave a comment:
-
I think we should use the bulk of the money to build nuclear power stations, and a small percentage of it on dodgy dossiers proclaiming that we don't actually have any weapons any more. Nobody will believe we have scrapped them anyway, so we get the deterrent value for free. Easy!!
Leave a comment:
-
We ought to use them. At least we would get our money's worth.
In reality the fallout from even a smallish nuclear exchange would probably do for a number of citizens of the winning country even if the losers never managed to launch any.
Leave a comment:
-
Nuclear power I am fine with that. But nuclear weapons are a complete waste of money particularly when we can’t use them independently. IE: The UK must ask permission from the US to use them.
Leave a comment:
-
And now is the time to do it, while James Bond is out of actionOriginally posted by NotAllThere View PostI'd spend it on developing little suitcase nukes in secret, planting them in the major cities of the world, and then blackmail the nations into turning their sovereignty over to me. While stroking my white cat of course.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd spend it on developing little suitcase nukes in secret, planting them in the major cities of the world, and then blackmail the nations into turning their sovereignty over to me. While stroking my white cat of course.
Leave a comment:
-
There is one little corner of expertise, but it's hanging by it's nails while the government decides to build the power-stations.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIf it keeps nuclear expertise up to scratch in this country it's worth every penny. (Not saying it necessarily does though, if the kit is simpy bought from the Yanks.)
But not having most of our electricity produced by UK-based nuclear power stations in a few years' time will be a heck of a lot more expensive and disastrous to the environment longer term. This is something Grenpeace and the like can never understand, and one of Labour's biggest failures over the last few years.
If the next government doesn't pull it's finger out that corner will disappear and we'll be completely swamped by the French...
Leave a comment:
-
If it keeps nuclear expertise up to scratch in this country it's worth every penny. (Not saying it necessarily does though, if the kit is simpy bought from the Yanks.)Originally posted by DotNetDeveloper View Post
The thought of all this public money being spent on nukes makes me feel
http://cut-trident.greenpeace.org.uk
Just imagine what could be done with that money, unbenching everyone on here for starters!
But not having most of our electricity produced by UK-based nuclear power stations in a few years' time will be a heck of a lot more expensive and disastrous to the environment longer term. This is something Grenpeace and the like can never understand, and one of Labour's biggest failures over the last few years.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd spend it on tanks, warships, helicopters and fighter planes.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
What would you do with £97 billion?
The thought of all this public money being spent on nukes makes me feel
http://cut-trident.greenpeace.org.uk
Just imagine what could be done with that money, unbenching everyone on here for starters!Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Leave a comment: