• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What would you do with £97 billion?"

Collapse

  • SizeZero
    replied
    I would find a struggling bank, see all the sad faces on bankers with empty pockets and suits from Burtons, and bail it out immediately.

    It's only fair.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
    I'd spend it on a hareem of ridiculously expensive hookers.
    Or you could hire Sasgurus mum until the end of time!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    I would give £1 billion to charity.

    Leave a comment:


  • DiscoStu
    replied
    I'd spend it on a hareem of ridiculously expensive hookers.

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    I think we should use the bulk of the money to build nuclear power stations, and a small percentage of it on dodgy dossiers proclaiming that we don't actually have any weapons any more. Nobody will believe we have scrapped them anyway, so we get the deterrent value for free. Easy!!

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    We ought to use them. At least we would get our money's worth.

    In reality the fallout from even a smallish nuclear exchange would probably do for a number of citizens of the winning country even if the losers never managed to launch any.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Nuclear power I am fine with that. But nuclear weapons are a complete waste of money particularly when we can’t use them independently. IE: The UK must ask permission from the US to use them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    I'd spend it on developing little suitcase nukes in secret, planting them in the major cities of the world, and then blackmail the nations into turning their sovereignty over to me. While stroking my white cat of course.
    And now is the time to do it, while James Bond is out of action

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I'd spend it on developing little suitcase nukes in secret, planting them in the major cities of the world, and then blackmail the nations into turning their sovereignty over to me. While stroking my white cat of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Even better

    "France, the main nuclear power of Europe"

    Leave a comment:


  • DotNetDeveloper
    replied
    "France, the main power of Europe"

    *Shudders*

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    If it keeps nuclear expertise up to scratch in this country it's worth every penny. (Not saying it necessarily does though, if the kit is simpy bought from the Yanks.)

    But not having most of our electricity produced by UK-based nuclear power stations in a few years' time will be a heck of a lot more expensive and disastrous to the environment longer term. This is something Grenpeace and the like can never understand, and one of Labour's biggest failures over the last few years.
    There is one little corner of expertise, but it's hanging by it's nails while the government decides to build the power-stations.

    If the next government doesn't pull it's finger out that corner will disappear and we'll be completely swamped by the French...

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by DotNetDeveloper View Post

    The thought of all this public money being spent on nukes makes me feel

    http://cut-trident.greenpeace.org.uk

    Just imagine what could be done with that money, unbenching everyone on here for starters!
    If it keeps nuclear expertise up to scratch in this country it's worth every penny. (Not saying it necessarily does though, if the kit is simpy bought from the Yanks.)

    But not having most of our electricity produced by UK-based nuclear power stations in a few years' time will be a heck of a lot more expensive and disastrous to the environment longer term. This is something Grenpeace and the like can never understand, and one of Labour's biggest failures over the last few years.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    I'd spend it on tanks, warships, helicopters and fighter planes.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • DotNetDeveloper
    started a topic What would you do with £97 billion?

    What would you do with £97 billion?

    The thought of all this public money being spent on nukes makes me feel

    http://cut-trident.greenpeace.org.uk

    Just imagine what could be done with that money, unbenching everyone on here for starters!

Working...
X