- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Nationwide AGM voting
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Nationwide AGM voting"
Collapse
-
Ok, I have taken a little time to look at this. (I'm juggling several bin lids at the moment, so nice to get a little change).
Normally I would stay out of this.
I'm fairly ambivalent about Nationwide even though a member/low key customer (accounts get very little use).
Nationwide tends to do what it says on the tin.
I did have concerns about the appointment of a certain Nationwide chief exec back in the day and voiced them in private circles with listening ears and was proved largely correct.
Nationwide does have a need for a "members - members representative" on its board.
The board is largely competent in my opinion. My opinion of the current SMT is largely the same. I have seen a large number of far worse boards/SMT's
I have had a squint at this chaps CV and also had a chat with a chum who is someone more in the know than I (we needed to speak today about another matter anyway).
This guy seems like a jolly japers chap. The CV is okay and but it is not amazing. At the top end the cv is lacking in my opinion for a directorship at an organisation such as Nationwide.
Nationwide does have members who have this top end and ability and I know of at least two personally. (desire for role and availability are probably another story on this one.)
On this basis I will stay out of it. I will wish him good luck with his endeavours.
Leave a comment:
-
F
I now have to dig out my paperwork.
I gave up voting as the board gets what the board wants.
Leave a comment:
-
I saw the email yesterday and was going to see what rationale the board had for a no vote. My immediate instinct was "don't tell me what to do!"
Leave a comment:
-
Nationwide AGM voting
Nothing to do with contracting
Most of us ignore elections for directors for financial organisations, but if you're a Nationwide member, pay a little more attention. For the first time in over 20 years a member has been nominated to the board. The board have recommended to vote against his appointment and provided a quick "accept board's recommendations" box for the lazy. Anyway I reckon he deserves a crack, so if you're a member, do have a look at the voting papers and perhaps make the effort to support a member being on the board of what is supposed to be a membership organisation. You can scan the QR code in your pack and do it with a couple of clicks.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...fair-treatmentTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Leave a comment: