Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
And as for the inflation forecasts, who knows what will happen now that US-Israel has started a war that impacts energy prices ... At least that might help keep interest rates at a sensible level.
Meanwhile, the 'Spring Statement' reveals that “This government has restored economic stability”. That'll be why prices in the supermarket go up every week, my Council Tax is rising at nearly 3 times the rate of inflation and my nominal income remains unchanged.
Successive Government(s) policy is the direct cause of the unemployment problem.
AI is a contributory factor and timing has been unfortunate, but its a convenient distraction for government to lean on.
Successive governments inflated the value of the benefits system such that there was little incentive for many unemployed people to seek work.
Rather than reduce benefits (and lose easy votes), they raised the minimum wage by more than inflation for a few years to restore that incentive.
Obviously the minimum wage threshold drives up the cost of employing people with skills valued more highly.
Now if one wants to hire an entry-level worker, one faces a range of significant costs to consider:
recruitment done right costs time and money sifting through CVs applications, interviewing, etc whether in-house or externally
salary
other costs of employment inc Employers NIC, Employers Pension etc
providing a safe, compliant work environment can be GBP5-10k per person in London and major cities
they need IT kit and infrastructure. Many on here will understand that the total cost can be GBP1-3k per user per year.
they need managing. A manager by definition will cost more. Efficient organisations might have 10-15 reports per manager. Across public sector that will typically be 2 reports per manager, so each new hire might require 10-20% of the (total, loaded) cost of a manager to deliver their work well.
employment won't work for everyone and the costs of unwinding in an HR-compliant manner can be significant, even for relatively junior roles. I know termination can be immediate up to 2 yrs, but in practice there will be meetings between manager and HR to confirm that mental health concerns have been followed, performance management has been correct, grievances and counter-grievances are managed without liability etc etc
Now assuming one isn't running a charity, one needs to make a profit on all that.
The total costs will be such a massive multiple of the cost of offshore and/or AI-enabled alternatives that the decision to undertake a new hire in UK is difficult.
TLDR; government has made cost of employing people here too expensive, handing a business case to offshore and AI alternatives.
Leave a comment: