• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Tax rises?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Tax rises?"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by willendure View Post

    Once upon a time, NI made sense, when it literally was an insurance premium that paid out to the unfortunate few requiring support during unemployment or health care. But ever since it was just folded into the rest of taxation flowing to the exchequer, then yes, it really makes no sense.

    I though that is why the primary threshold was changed to align with the income tax starting threshold? As a step towards getting rid of it.

    But its the gift that goes on giving as far as chancellors are concerned so probably we are stuck with it.
    It won't go away. Any party, least of all this one, wants to be accused of increasing the level of income tax, which is what merging NICs into Income Tax would mean to the man in the street.

    Plus you would double the tax burden on everyone over the retirement age....

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post
    Every time, the elephant in the room causing tax distortions is NI. It really is time that government brought forward some proposals to retire this tax.
    Once upon a time, NI made sense, when it literally was an insurance premium that paid out to the unfortunate few requiring support during unemployment or health care. But ever since it was just folded into the rest of taxation flowing to the exchequer, then yes, it really makes no sense.

    I though that is why the primary threshold was changed to align with the income tax starting threshold? As a step towards getting rid of it.

    But its the gift that goes on giving as far as chancellors are concerned so probably we are stuck with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    Every time, the elephant in the room causing tax distortions is NI. It really is time that government brought forward some proposals to retire this tax.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    sorteeed

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    well that has to be a guess wouldn't it

    it depends if

    your pension plan to draw down to zero within a fixed number of years

    or you have an income generating pension where you can live off the income without touching the source of the income

    have a think about that

    Milan.
    CBA, really, - i'm sorted

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    give it a rest ffs :-)

    the question is, how much do you need / will you need

    to retire on (this means what are/will your monthly costs be)

    and for how long

    is your pension instrument of choice inflation proof

    if you have the answers to those questions and can tick those boxes as solved then you're laughing

    and then all this talk of budgets doesn't matter

    Milan.
    It's more interesting than your boring ski holidays, Milan. Snooze central

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    well that has to be a guess wouldn't it

    it depends if

    your pension plan to draw down to zero within a fixed number of years

    or you have an income generating pension where you can live off the income without touching the source of the income

    have a think about that

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    give it a rest ffs :-)

    the question is, how much do you need / will you need

    to retire on (this means what are/will your monthly costs be)

    and for how long

    is your pension instrument of choice inflation proof

    if you have the answers to those questions and can tick those boxes as solved then you're laughing

    and then all this talk of budgets doesn't matter

    Milan.
    aye, - right!

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    give it a rest ffs :-)

    the question is, how much do you need / will you need

    to retire on (this means what are/will your monthly costs be)

    and for how long

    is your pension instrument of choice inflation proof

    if you have the answers to those questions and can tick those boxes as solved then you're laughing

    and then all this talk of budgets doesn't matter

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post
    Hidden in the detail is no change to rates but there could be a change to the thresholds.


    Drop the income tax threshold
    Increase Employee threshold for a a working person for a net zero change
    Bring Employer pension contributions/salary sacrifice in scope of Emp NI and Income tax

    Net result is private pensioners and private pension are now taxable.
    Eh? Pensioners already pay income tax (a personal tax) and personal income is completely separate from business income. If they were to charge EeNI on pension income, that would be a (consistent) personal tax too, given that NI is not hypothecated (despite popular misunderstanding), although they are unlikely to do it. Charging ErNI on employer contributions is also consistent, although it sounds as though SalSac is squarely the focus for understandable reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post
    Apparently, the fiscal forecasts aren't quite as bad as feared. Productivity downgrade offset by some improvements in wage growth and tax receipts.

    On the downside, it sounds like a death-by-a-thousand-cuts budget, so expect general chaos (c.f. pasty tax) and much hammering of contractors and the wealthier.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueSharp View Post
    Hidden in the detail is no change to rates but there could be a change to the thresholds.


    Drop the income tax threshold
    Increase Employee threshold for a a working person for a net zero change
    Bring Employer pension contributions/salary sacrifice in scope of Emp NI and Income tax

    Net result is private pensioners and private pension are now taxable.
    They already are. Quite a lot of us are paying it...

    Leave a comment:


  • Smartie
    replied
    The IFS has new analysis today regarding the issue of frozen tax thresholds.
    Seems that it will be continued in the budget and has the following effect:

    "Finally, since most means-tested benefits are by default uprated in line with inflation, individuals in households that receive means-tested benefits are increasingly likely to also pay income taxes. The number of taxpayers in families entitled to universal credit (UC) would rise to 3.1 million if the freezes are extended, 690,000 more than if there had been no freezes and 110,000 more than under current policy. This matters because these workers face particularly weak work incentives. Families in receipt of UC see 55p of benefit withdrawn for every £1 increase in the family’s after-tax earnings, meaning that workers on UC who do not also pay income tax or NICs keep 45p for every pound they earn. However, those who do pay income tax and NICs typically keep at most 32p from an extra £1 earned."

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueSharp
    replied
    Hidden in the detail is no change to rates but there could be a change to the thresholds.


    Drop the income tax threshold
    Increase Employee threshold for a a working person for a net zero change
    Bring Employer pension contributions/salary sacrifice in scope of Emp NI and Income tax

    Net result is private pensioners and private pension are now taxable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    And now this ….

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ates-in-budget

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X