Originally posted by hobnob
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Which option would you choose?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Which option would you choose?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by WTFH View Post
OK, so you want to do your job, and when the period of that contract is up, if they want to keep you on, you'd have a contract review with them, and maybe they'd increase your rate, but most likely they wouldn't.
When I read about contractors "not wanting to play politics", I realise they are not very good contractors. We play more politics that anyone else. Keep our head down, do the job well, make sure they know you are doing your job well, make sure you know who to blame when it's not happening etc.
I look at permies and they have their half yearly town hall, which is a 3 hour meeting during working hours, followed by a meal out and unlimited drinks. All paid for, no funny business, no "how can I claim this on expenses".
I kinda think you're missing the point, but that's unsurprising.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Snooky View Post
Gosh, that's a tough one.
It's a very decent salary and of course that should come with other benefits like pension, paid holiday, private healthcare etc. If you were to work the same schedule (260 working days a year - 25 days holiday - 8 bank holidays), the permanent role comes out head & shoulders ahead of the contract in financial terms, since it's inside IR35 so the taxation basis will be virtually identical. And that doesn't even take the ancillary benefits into account.
You don't say what the commute is? If it's by rail, that obviously comes out of your net income so, to pay (say) £3k a year for your travel will mean you have to earn at least £6k a year more at your marginal tax rate. But even then the contract is still way off what the permie role will give you financially. Driving will probably work out cheaper.
So I assume what you're really asking is opinions on whether the extra nonsense that comes with being permie, plus the 8 hours commuting a week, is worth the extra money.
Much as I loved contracting in days gone by, it's not what it was and so I don't think I'd struggle too much with permie things like town halls & annual reviews. But it really depends how much stupid employee stuff that particular organisation is into.
When I was younger, I'd have put up with 4 hours rail travel twice a week for the extra money. I spent 30 years commuting into London, 2.5-3 hours a day total, because that's where the big money was. You can relax, you can read, you can sleep, you can get your own admin done. But I'd never put up with 4 hours driving twice a week unless I really couldn't find another job. Some folks love driving - I hate it.
So my view on this is that I'd take the permie role if it was a rail commute. Once you have your feet under the desk and have proven your worth a little, you might find that the 2 days a week in the office isn't as strict as you think, and other colleagues are only in once a week or even less.
I don't have any issue with the town halls, meetings, politics [I like to keep a low profile anyway ].
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by CDP90 View Post1. Full time WFH - £650 / day, inside ir35, long contract (min 2 years).
OR
2. 180K package, permanent staff, twice a week to office (2 hours commute each way). I have no commitments, so I can commute if required but I have been doing WFH for more than 8 years (before COVID) hence unsure about the challenges I face.
Appreciate your feedback / vote.
It's a very decent salary and of course that should come with other benefits like pension, paid holiday, private healthcare etc. If you were to work the same schedule (260 working days a year - 25 days holiday - 8 bank holidays), the permanent role comes out head & shoulders ahead of the contract in financial terms, since it's inside IR35 so the taxation basis will be virtually identical. And that doesn't even take the ancillary benefits into account.
You don't say what the commute is? If it's by rail, that obviously comes out of your net income so, to pay (say) £3k a year for your travel will mean you have to earn at least £6k a year more at your marginal tax rate. But even then the contract is still way off what the permie role will give you financially. Driving will probably work out cheaper.
So I assume what you're really asking is opinions on whether the extra nonsense that comes with being permie, plus the 8 hours commuting a week, is worth the extra money.
Much as I loved contracting in days gone by, it's not what it was and so I don't think I'd struggle too much with permie things like town halls & annual reviews. But it really depends how much stupid employee stuff that particular organisation is into.
When I was younger, I'd have put up with 4 hours rail travel twice a week for the extra money. I spent 30 years commuting into London, 2.5-3 hours a day total, because that's where the big money was. You can relax, you can read, you can sleep, you can get your own admin done. But I'd never put up with 4 hours driving twice a week unless I really couldn't find another job. Some folks love driving - I hate it.
So my view on this is that I'd take the permie role if it was a rail commute. Once you have your feet under the desk and have proven your worth a little, you might find that the 2 days a week in the office isn't as strict as you think, and other colleagues are only in once a week or even less.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by milanbenes View Post... I don't give a monkeeeees about yearly performance reviews, town hall meetings, waiting to see if I get a bonus or not, playing politics to keep my role
and
what I love about contracting is, all I have to do is my job on the terms that we agreed for the period that we agreed,...
When I read about contractors "not wanting to play politics", I realise they are not very good contractors. We play more politics that anyone else. Keep our head down, do the job well, make sure they know you are doing your job well, make sure you know who to blame when it's not happening etc.
I look at permies and they have their half yearly town hall, which is a 3 hour meeting during working hours, followed by a meal out and unlimited drinks. All paid for, no funny business, no "how can I claim this on expenses".
I kinda think you're missing the point, but that's unsurprising.
Leave a comment:
-
I would never ever be an employ again
why, and what I love about contracting
I am a tradesman, and all I want to do is my trade to the best of my ability, and I don't give a monkeeeees about yearly performance reviews, town hall meetings, waiting to see if I get a bonus or not, playing politics to keep my role
and
what I love about contracting is, all I have to do is my job on the terms that we agreed for the period that we agreed, I have complete responsibility for my skills and positioning myself according to where I see future demands, and I don't have to deal with any of the non-trade nonsense that I would have to deal with as an employee
so, my answer is the contract
but, I don't know how the inside ir35 rate compares to the after tax salary as I am not on the island
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Which option would you choose?
1. Full time WFH - £650 / day, inside ir35, long contract (min 2 years).
OR
2. 180K package, permanent staff, twice a week to office (2 hours commute each way). I have no commitments, so I can commute if required but I have been doing WFH for more than 8 years (before COVID) hence unsure about the challenges I face.
Appreciate your feedback / vote.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: