• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Kleptocrats at it again."

Collapse

  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    ICBW but didn't the Blair government try something very similar, but gave it up quite quickly?

    Unless they impose rules on who the funds are invested in, they aren't going to help the UK anyway; the trustees can only use the most efficient returns by law -- which aren't likely to be UK ones!
    I suspect that is where things are headed - rules about investing a certain % in UK. Someone has to buy the UKs debt after all, might as well shove it down the throat of us mugs.
    Last edited by willendure; 14 November 2024, 15:13.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    You're just not Wailing.
    I DO have some reggae licks though

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    ICBW but didn't the Blair government try something very similar, but gave it up quite quickly?

    Unless they impose rules on who the funds are invested in, they aren't going to help the UK anyway; the trustees can only use the most efficient returns by law -- which aren't likely to be UK ones!

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post
    yeh, probably most likely.
    or not.
    maybe.
    perhaps.
    possibly.
    Problem is that trying to make things more efficient must be wrong, and even though there's no mention of changes in tax, that is also incorrect.

    You're just not Wailing.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    yeh, probably most likely.
    or not.
    maybe.
    perhaps.
    possibly.

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    started a topic Kleptocrats at it again.

    Kleptocrats at it again.

    This time: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gve4d8jljo

    Last time: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/...on-errors.html

    Look at state pensions in the USA and the way Wall Street is taking them for a ride. I would be very sceptical about these mega funds and the dodgy fuind managers that will run them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdFq1aEITl4

    I didn't see anything about SIPPs, which is probably the most likely kind of pension a contractor would have? Hopefully they will leave us alone, right?
Working...
X