• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Inheritance squabbles."

Collapse

  • DealorNoDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    My aunt is heavily into spiritualism.
    Did she say when your father had "spoken" to her? Wasn't this year was it?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
    There's one way to settle the matter. Consult a Medium.

    My aunt is heavily into spiritualism.

    Leave a comment:


  • DealorNoDeal
    replied
    There's one way to settle the matter. Consult a Medium.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by pr1 View Post
    either way it is does not seem implausible based on the other things you've stated that your father might have said something to her
    But it's impossible to prove and all paper evidence (the will, the fact it never came up in a discussion) says something completely different to what the Aunt is claiming.

    Leave a comment:


  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    This is the entire source of my outrage. My aunt made it clear that her daughter should get 100% of her state but that my father's will should be amended to sort out others.
    Your father may have said/implied/suggested/joked at some point that he would leave her some of his estate
    Your aunt may want to leave 100% of her estate to her daughter

    These are not mutually exclusive

    From a quick look at your other threads and the fact you're posting on this site you're probably not below the poverty line so this is coming down to a matter of principle to you rather than needing the inheritance/money - perhaps your aunt is not as financially secure as you or, as the anecdotes are suggesting, perhaps she is just money grabbing - either way it is does not seem implausible based on the other things you've stated that your father might have said something to her

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post

    Mirror Wills tend to cover this with provision made on single or joint death and also on the last survivors death, so it can be the only Will needed. Of course there is nothing to stop the single survivor from changing the Mirrored Will, so it is an act of trust. They are more common in second marriages for the complications you describe.
    Just to comment that there are legal rights under Scottish law in favour of the children of a deceased person that allow claims on an estate, which somewhat offset the risk of the survivor's Will being changed. However, this doesn't cover houses, only 'movable estate', so isn't really a substitute for a properly constructed Trust arrangement.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post

    Mirror Wills tend to cover this with provision made on single or joint death and also on the last survivors death, so it can be the only Will needed. Of course there is nothing to stop the single survivor from changing the Mirrored Will, so it is an act of trust. They are more common in second marriages for the complications you describe.
    I know a few people now who due to having children from a first marriage have put their house in trust. So that means when the first spouse dies the other can still live in the house until their death, then the successors get their money. Unfortunately some aren't set up properly so there are issues over which party is responsible for maintenance and repairs...

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    Not really. Imagine the two of you are in a car crash. You are killed instantly and your partner dies in hospital later without regaining consciousness. Without a specific will in place, the entire estate goes to her 'successors'. If you for instance had a child from another marriage, they get nothing.

    You might not care but your partner may well do if the situations were reversed.
    Mirror Wills tend to cover this with provision made on single or joint death and also on the last survivors death, so it can be the only Will needed. Of course there is nothing to stop the single survivor from changing the Mirrored Will, so it is an act of trust. They are more common in second marriages for the complications you describe.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    The point of mirror wills is to protect the surviving partner and then when there's one left standing, they are well within their rights to make changes based on how their life goes afterwards.
    Not really. Imagine the two of you are in a car crash. You are killed instantly and your partner dies in hospital later without regaining consciousness. Without a specific will in place, the entire estate goes to her 'successors'. If you for instance had a child from another marriage, they get nothing.

    You might not care but your partner may well do if the situations were reversed.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I think we modified the will as her executors to ensure we were not giving him our money but (for inheritance tax reasons), this is legal but you are of course under absolutely no obligation to do so.
    This is the entire source of my outrage. My aunt made it clear that her daughter should get 100% of her state but that my father's will should be amended to sort out others.
    Last edited by TheDude; 3 May 2023, 11:00.

    Leave a comment:


  • DealorNoDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    TBH if I had a partner and mirror wills in place, I wouldn't care. I'd be dead.
    This.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    After the first one of you dies the other one who inherits everything can modify their own will to disinherit the pet charity. This can either be directly e.g. you decide to leave everything to the teen who talks to you daily out of the kindness of their heart, or indirectly e.g. you get married.

    I'm just thankful my eldest siblings are fair minded. So fair they have been trusted with dealing with other people' estates/trusts.
    TBH if I had a partner and mirror wills in place, I wouldn't care. I'd be dead.

    The point of mirror wills is to protect the surviving partner and then when there's one left standing, they are well within their rights to make changes based on how their life goes afterwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Not "really" relevant to the OP but this information may be of assistance to at least one of you out there...

    If one of your parents dies before the other and leaves *everything* to the surviving parent then on the death of the second parent both allowances of £325k can be claimed against Inheritance Tax. Thus no inheritance tax is due on the first £650k of the estate.

    Hope that helps someone.
    Yes, you have to apply to HMRC within two years of parent #2 dying to transfer the unused allowance over.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
    Got no kids. Can't stand any of our remaining close relatives. Don't intend to leave much behind anyway. We'll downsize, or do equity release, at some point so there's not much left in the property.

    Our mirror Wills leave everything to a pet charity to take care of our pets.
    After the first one of you dies the other one who inherits everything can modify their own will to disinherit the pet charity. This can either be directly e.g. you decide to leave everything to the teen who talks to you daily out of the kindness of their heart, or indirectly e.g. you get married.

    I'm just thankful my eldest siblings are fair minded. So fair they have been trusted with dealing with other people' estates/trusts.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    It's not muddled.

    1. My aunt wants 100% of her own estate to go to her daughter - any trust is up to her and nothing to do with my fathers estate.

    2. She also believes my father should have amended his will to look after her side of the family which I find quite unbelievable considering the point above.
    1 & 2 seem somewhat unrelated, but in either case 1)is her problem though giving advice is kind of you 2)this is totally out of your hands assuming you have no knowledge of any desire he had to change the will... tough for her basically.

    When mum died her children inherited the estate 50:50 but we wanted to help out her brother (our uncle). I think we modified the will as her executors to ensure we were not giving him our money but (for inheritance tax reasons), this is legal but you are of course under absolutely no obligation to do so.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X