• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Photography cheat

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Photography cheat"

Collapse

  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post

    Only local ones, not national or magazine ones, but yes :-) Also, that winning pic is obviously AI, because there are certain things that AI is tulipe at. Anyone who's spent 5 mins fannying around with AI photos would spot it. Have a close look at the fingers on the younger woman's shoulders. Ai struggles with hands, among other things.
    It goes in to meltdown and crashes when you ask it to draw a short Scotsman at a bar buying a round.

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    Does your acquaintance submit their paintings to competitions?
    Only local ones, not national or magazine ones, but yes :-) Also, that winning pic is obviously AI, because there are certain things that AI is tulipe at. Anyone who's spent 5 mins fannying around with AI photos would spot it. Have a close look at the fingers on the younger woman's shoulders. Ai struggles with hands, among other things.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    This is true. I did work experience centuries ago (well it feels like it!) with a photographer who had his own dark room. He taught me how to process film and create a photo print. There's some simple tricks to selectively overexposing parts of an image. He only did black and white photos, anything taken in colour was sent to a lab for processing.
    Be careful a certain poster will be along to ask you about your modelling career....

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Touching up was done using a fine brush and Indian ink for B+W.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Dark rooms were always a part of photography, straightening and enlarging the image was a first basic step.
    This is true. I did work experience centuries ago (well it feels like it!) with a photographer who had his own dark room. He taught me how to process film and create a photo print. There's some simple tricks to selectively overexposing parts of an image. He only did black and white photos, anything taken in colour was sent to a lab for processing.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Yep and blemish removal

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Some would argue that editing a photo to remove unwanted bits is cheating. Others would go further to say that enhancing a photo is cheating.
    There used to be competitions on Flickr called "SOOC" - Straight Out Of Camera. You weren't allowed to straighten it or anything. It made people better photographers because it took things back to old school principles, where you recorded on film and didn't get to play round with it.
    Dark rooms were always a part of photography, straightening and enlarging the image was a first basic step.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Some would argue that editing a photo to remove unwanted bits is cheating. Others would go further to say that enhancing a photo is cheating.
    There used to be competitions on Flickr called "SOOC" - Straight Out Of Camera. You weren't allowed to straighten it or anything. It made people better photographers because it took things back to old school principles, where you recorded on film and didn't get to play round with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    I very much doubt that's the 'start' of anything. AI has been able to create accurate watercolour/acrylic paintings and 8k pictures for ages now. I know someone who makes a living selling prints of 'paintings' online and selling to stock sites.
    Does your acquaintance submit their paintings to competitions?

    Leave a comment:


  • TestMangler
    replied
    I very much doubt that's the 'start' of anything. AI has been able to create accurate watercolour/acrylic paintings and 8k pictures for ages now. I know someone who makes a living selling prints of 'paintings' online and selling to stock sites.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    started a topic Photography cheat

    Photography cheat

    The cheating has started....

    https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...s-ai-generated

    A photographer is refusing a prestigious award after admitting to being a “cheeky monkey” and generating the prize-winning image using artificial intelligence.
    The German artist Boris Eldagsen revealed on his website that he was not accepting the prize for the creative open category, which he won at last week’s Sony world photography awards.

    The winning photograph depicted two women from different generations in black and white.

Working...
X