Someone's president meets someone's king - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Zigenare replied

28 February 2023, 12:54
Originally posted by d000hg View Post

No, I don't feel a strong sense of moral outrage. Perhaps look words up before using them?

And that was about the most vapid of vapid comments, but then you're nothing if not a hypocrite.

I wasn't accusing you of moral outrage, merely highlighting your need to post the last word, to also highlight your inability to have a discussion without resorting to ad hominem attacks.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

28 February 2023, 12:22
Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

Triggered, much?

No, I don't feel a strong sense of moral outrage. Perhaps look words up before using them?

And that was about the most vapid of vapid comments, but then you're nothing if not a hypocrite.
Leave a comment:
Zigenare replied

28 February 2023, 11:24
Originally posted by d000hg View Post

Your post history strongly contradicts that. You love replying to them and you love writing them.

Triggered, much?
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

28 February 2023, 11:09
Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

I have an aversion to empty vapid comments and the wastes of time that post them. Hth.

Your post history strongly contradicts that. You love replying to them and you love writing them.
Leave a comment:
woohoo replied

27 February 2023, 20:10
Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

I have an aversion to empty vapid comments and the wastes of time that post them. Hth.

You can ignore my empty vapid comments.
Leave a comment:
Zigenare replied

27 February 2023, 19:07
Originally posted by woohoo View Post

You really do have a bee in your bonnet.

I have an aversion to empty vapid comments and the wastes of time that post them. Hth.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

27 February 2023, 18:03
Originally posted by woohoo View Post

Yes there are, though i would rather we didn’t have a monarchy.

Which is fair but he's still the king. Bit like those "not my president berks" who seem to think if it's not the leader they want, it's not their leader.
Leave a comment:
woohoo replied

27 February 2023, 16:52
Originally posted by d000hg View Post

That's rather the point of a king/queen, they are one regardless what you think. There are popular and unpopular monarchs.

Yes there are, though i would rather we didn’t have a monarchy.
Leave a comment:
woohoo replied

27 February 2023, 16:50
Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

That's a rather infantile comment. Does the mention of his name make you have a little bit of sick in your mouth?

You really do have a bee in your bonnet.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

27 February 2023, 15:50
Originally posted by woohoo View Post

I really can't stand Charles, I can't even refer to him as king.

That's rather the point of a king/queen, they are one regardless what you think. There are popular and unpopular monarchs.
Leave a comment:
NotAllThere replied

27 February 2023, 15:41
Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

Someone is not impressed ..

Nigel Farage says it is 'disgraceful' Sunak has asked king to meet Von der Leyen, and implies Charles should have refused

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

Why would someone who is elected want to meet with someone's king anyway?

So someone who is rabidly anti-EU objects to the King meeting the president of the European Commission. How fascinating.
Leave a comment:
Zigenare replied

27 February 2023, 15:11
Originally posted by woohoo View Post

I really can't stand Charles, I can't even refer to him as king. But I suppose we can inflict him on Von Der Leyen, so at least he has some purpose.

That's a rather infantile comment. Does the mention of his name make you have a little bit of sick in your mouth?
Leave a comment:
woohoo replied

27 February 2023, 14:43
I really can't stand Charles, I can't even refer to him as king. But I suppose we can inflict him on Von Der Leyen, so at least he has some purpose.
Leave a comment:
DoctorStrangelove replied

27 February 2023, 13:16
The Orange Moron was desperate to meet the late Queen.
Leave a comment:
d000hg replied

27 February 2023, 13:02
Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

Someone is not impressed ..

Nigel Farage says it is 'disgraceful' Sunak has asked king to meet Von der Leyen, and implies Charles should have refused

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

Why would someone who is elected want to meet with someone's king anyway?

I didn't vote for any current national leader, but there are quite a few I would like to meet. Who would turn down a royal invitation, it's a rare experience.
Leave a comment: