Reply to: Someone's president meets someone's king

[Zigenare]

No, I don't feel a strong sense of moral outrage. Perhaps look words up before using them?

And that was about the most vapid of vapid comments, but then you're nothing if not a hypocrite.

I wasn't accusing you of moral outrage, merely highlighting your need to post the last word, to also highlight your inability to have a discussion without resorting to ad hominem attacks.

[d000hg]

Triggered, much?

No, I don't feel a strong sense of moral outrage. Perhaps look words up before using them?

And that was about the most vapid of vapid comments, but then you're nothing if not a hypocrite.

[Zigenare]

Your post history strongly contradicts that. You love replying to them and you love writing them.

Triggered, much?

[d000hg]

I have an aversion to empty vapid comments and the wastes of time that post them. Hth.

Your post history strongly contradicts that. You love replying to them and you love writing them.

[woohoo]

I have an aversion to empty vapid comments and the wastes of time that post them. Hth.

You can ignore my empty vapid comments.

[Zigenare]

You really do have a bee in your bonnet.

I have an aversion to empty vapid comments and the wastes of time that post them. Hth.

[d000hg]

Yes there are, though i would rather we didn’t have a monarchy.

Which is fair but he's still the king. Bit like those "not my president berks" who seem to think if it's not the leader they want, it's not their leader.

[woohoo]

That's rather the point of a king/queen, they are one regardless what you think. There are popular and unpopular monarchs.

Yes there are, though i would rather we didn’t have a monarchy.

[woohoo]

That's a rather infantile comment. Does the mention of his name make you have a little bit of sick in your mouth?

You really do have a bee in your bonnet.

[d000hg]

I really can't stand Charles, I can't even refer to him as king.

That's rather the point of a king/queen, they are one regardless what you think. There are popular and unpopular monarchs.

[NotAllThere]

Someone is not impressed ..

Nigel Farage says it is 'disgraceful' Sunak has asked king to meet Von der Leyen, and implies Charles should have refused

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

Why would someone who is elected want to meet with someone's king anyway?

So someone who is rabidly anti-EU objects to the King meeting the president of the European Commission. How fascinating.

[Zigenare]

I really can't stand Charles, I can't even refer to him as king. But I suppose we can inflict him on Von Der Leyen, so at least he has some purpose.

That's a rather infantile comment. Does the mention of his name make you have a little bit of sick in your mouth?

[woohoo]

I really can't stand Charles, I can't even refer to him as king. But I suppose we can inflict him on Von Der Leyen, so at least he has some purpose.

[DoctorStrangelove]

The Orange Moron was desperate to meet the late Queen.

[d000hg]

Someone is not impressed ..

Nigel Farage says it is 'disgraceful' Sunak has asked king to meet Von der Leyen, and implies Charles should have refused

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

Why would someone who is elected want to meet with someone's king anyway?

I didn't vote for any current national leader, but there are quite a few I would like to meet. Who would turn down a royal invitation, it's a rare experience.