Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I think the Bible should be in line for literary revisionism
good point
Sodom and Gomorrah need a bit of updating. Of course the betrothal of an underage Mary is suspect. A bit of stoning for various crimes.
The Torah & Koran need work...
I'd read her books when I was bored and snaffled them from my sisters, but frankly I never liked them. Roald Dahl may have been a tulip, but he could write!
In other new, Agatha Christies book, now known as "And then there were none", only had its title changed in 1985, in the UK. In the US, they changed it in 1941.
What about Edith Blyton?
She was sexist, racist, xenophobic, nasty to her first husband and more, yet apparently she is the world's most popular children's author.
Apparently even back then Dahl's publishers had to request changes. A strange man, but great books.
In other new, Agatha Christies book, now known as "And then there were none", only had its title changed in 1985, in the UK. In the US, they changed it in 1941.
Does Tom Sawyer sell in the same numbers it did when it was first released - hint it doesn't because the world moved on and it seems old fashioned.
The estate of Roald Dahl (for which read Netflix having paid $x00,000,000 for exclusive rights) want to rewrite the books and have ever right to do so.
And Roald Dahl did the same - his editor hated the original version of Matilda so he re-wrote her to not torture her parents.
As was argued in the article, if these books are no longer appropriate, let them wither rather than being watered down. They are supposed to be nasty, that was the case even when first published, and the attraction of them.
That said Tom Sawyer is still considered a classic.
The rights holders have the legal right to do what they want, but it's pretty crass to start hacking someone else's work to make it "nicer".
RD was apparently quite an anti-semite, which I wasn't aware of. If he was a slave-trader, his books would be out of print in protest, but antisemitism we just brush under the carpet?
Filed under #TheWorldsGoneMad, #WokeMadness, yada yada. What utter bunkum.
Parents who read and enjoyed these books as children, without being morally damaged by them, are deciding they are not appropriate for their own kids (nobody asks the kids of course).
What next, taking the naughty words out of Tom Sawyer?
Does Tom Sawyer sell in the same numbers it did when it was first released - hint it doesn't because the world moved on and it seems old fashioned.
The estate of Roald Dahl (for which read Netflix having paid $x00,000,000 for exclusive rights) want to rewrite the books and have ever right to do so.
And Roald Dahl did the same - his editor hated the original version of Matilda so he re-wrote her to not torture her parents.
Leave a comment: