• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Ouch that is cold

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ouch that is cold"

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Can't be *ed to post any inks but seen so many reports of problems over the years with some charities, lush spending on headquarters, high wages for bosses, unreasonable prosecutions, mispent money that ends up in the hands of corrupt/criminals, excessive amounts spent on political lobbying etc. Need more controls.
    You missed out sexual exploitation of minors in your long list of the tulip they get up to.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Can't be *ed to post any inks but seen so many reports of problems over the years with some charities, lush spending on headquarters, high wages for bosses, unreasonable prosecutions, mispent money that ends up in the hands of corrupt/criminals, excessive amounts spent on political lobbying etc. Need more controls.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by David71 View Post

    Not just the PO and Gas companies with powers you'd be surprised by. The RSPCA has (admittedly not un-restricted) access to the National Firearms Licensing System (NFLMS).
    The RSPCA are the ones who will "investigate" and prosecute you for alleged animal welfare offences.

    Oh and don't leave them or any large charity a percentage of your estate. If you wish to leave a charity money leave a fixed sum.

    Large charities especially the RSPCA take executors to Court for not being able to get the most money from a deceased love ones estate e.g. a house that may have a market value of £1million is generally worth less as someone's estate but the charity refuses to recognise that.

    Leave a comment:


  • David71
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    hey look at the Gas suppliers with forced meter changes.

    These need to go on the list of things that needs fixing and passed to the next government if not completed by the current one.
    Not just the PO and Gas companies with powers you'd be surprised by. The RSPCA has (admittedly not un-restricted) access to the National Firearms Licensing System (NFLMS).

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    hopefully that will cost them dearly.
    The woman in charge eventually resigned.

    I think she ended up on a board elsewhere soon afterwards though.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    The supplier management said it was impossible for Horizon to be the source of errors. Er... Halting Problem anyone?
    hopefully that will cost them dearly.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    The supplier management said it was impossible for Horizon to be the source of errors. Er... Halting Problem anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

    I think that there's some bias in government in favour of large enterprises and against the interests of 'the people'.
    I have no confidence in this government's desire or ability to fix anything.
    or any previous governments.

    These powers are a holdover from when they were nationalised, large landlords for instance do not have the same right to access the property to do gas safety checks which are a an annual legal requirement. I doubt Tesco or SportsDirect have the right to raise a criminal prosecution.

    What should happen is a review of such rights pre/post privatisation (or merger HMRC acquiring customs & excise rights) and remove as needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    hey look at the Gas suppliers with forced meter changes.

    These need to go on the list of things that needs fixing and passed to the next government if not completed by the current one.
    I think that there's some bias in government in favour of large enterprises and against the interests of 'the people'.
    I have no confidence in this government's desire or ability to fix anything.
    Last edited by Protagoras; 17 February 2023, 11:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

    Somehow Horizon was omitted from their exhibition.
    https://www.postalmuseum.org/blog/th...ation-branch/#

    "The Post Office Solicitors’ Office has been succeeded by Royal Mail Legal Services, which continues to be recognised by the Ministry of Justice as a private prosecutor in England and Wales."

    Why should such a privilege still exist?
    hey look at the Gas suppliers with forced meter changes.

    These need to go on the list of things that needs fixing and passed to the next government if not completed by the current one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    The post office were allowed to investigate and prosecute their own cases.
    Somehow Horizon was omitted from their exhibition.
    https://www.postalmuseum.org/blog/th...ation-branch/#

    "The Post Office Solicitors’ Office has been succeeded by Royal Mail Legal Services, which continues to be recognised by the Ministry of Justice as a private prosecutor in England and Wales."

    Why should such a privilege still exist?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    One of the most incomprehensible cases ever. Surely money apparently missing from an account was not proof against these people, wouldn't they have had to show in court that they had actually received it? And the sheer number of cases all at the same time must have indicated something was wrong with the system.
    The post office were allowed to investigate and prosecute their own cases.

    The Post Office decided that the software couldn't be wrong so if there were accounting mistakes the post master was at fault.

    This was even though a union rep had been shown and a few programmers who had worked on the system pointed out that there were loads of errors in the system.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

    Given the scale of this, I reckon that there's more than one person eligible for the clink! Following due process, of course.
    definitely that was more of a filter.

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    You would think that would happen, the Register was reporting on this for decades. It was suggesting Horizon was suspect a long time ago.

    As you say you would think the lawyers would have pointed out the volume and lack of money in a very select group of individuals. Running a post office was something that required a very responsible individual of good standing.

    Agree someone who ran Horizon and failed to investigate what were obviously system issues needs to go to jail.
    Given the scale of this, I reckon that there's more than one person eligible for the clink! Following due process, of course.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    One of the most incomprehensible cases ever. Surely money apparently missing from an account was not proof against these people, wouldn't they have had to show in court that they had actually received it? And the sheer number of cases all at the same time must have indicated something was wrong with the system.
    You would think that would happen, the Register was reporting on this for decades. It was suggesting Horizon was suspect a long time ago.

    As you say you would think the lawyers would have pointed out the volume and lack of money in a very select group of individuals. Running a post office was something that required a very responsible individual of good standing.

    Agree someone who ran Horizon and failed to investigate what were obviously system issues needs to go to jail.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X