- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: £70,000,000,000 paid to Tory Donor
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "£70,000,000,000 paid to Tory Donor"
Collapse
-
Apparently it's an arrangement but not a contract even though it went out to tender as a contract and to call it a contract was a mistake even though there is a contract. Meanwhile, the directors names are plastered all over the Panama papers. Sounds legit'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hobnob View PostI don't think it's quite as bad as it looks. I saw a couple of Twitter threads about this earlier:
Matt Honeycombe-Foster on Twitter: "So the government has absolutely NOT awarded a 70BN contract to a random Cornish company to oversee the entire net zero transition. Here's the quite boring (but much less viral) thing that's actually happened:" / Twitter
Benjamin P. Taylor on Twitter: "OK - everyone should calm down. This isn't a government intention to spend £70bn on an unknown consultancy. But this is a slightly different type of scandal. It's a Framework Agreement - a legitimate way of setting up easier purchasing through a pre-qualified and legal contract." / Twitter
Apparently this is to do with procurement frameworks (i.e. this company is acting as a middle man), and the 70 billion is an upper limit of what's going to be spent over the next few years rather than a big cheque being issued on day 1.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't think it's quite as bad as it looks. I saw a couple of Twitter threads about this earlier:
Matt Honeycombe-Foster on Twitter: "So the government has absolutely NOT awarded a 70BN contract to a random Cornish company to oversee the entire net zero transition. Here's the quite boring (but much less viral) thing that's actually happened:" / Twitter
Benjamin P. Taylor on Twitter: "OK - everyone should calm down. This isn't a government intention to spend £70bn on an unknown consultancy. But this is a slightly different type of scandal. It's a Framework Agreement - a legitimate way of setting up easier purchasing through a pre-qualified and legal contract." / Twitter
Apparently this is to do with procurement frameworks (i.e. this company is acting as a middle man), and the 70 billion is an upper limit of what's going to be spent over the next few years rather than a big cheque being issued on day 1.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Leave a comment:
-
£70,000,000,000 paid to Tory Donor
£70,000,000,000 paid to Tory Donor via Micky Mouse Lt Co for Zero Carbon consultancy although the consultant has zero experienceTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: