Reply to: Vexing phrases

[NotAllThere]

2022-03-13 Is it just me? Or is ‘no worries’ an utterly infuriating phrase? asks LIZ HOGGARD

Usually the answer to a Daily Fail headline question is "No". But this is an exception (well the second question in the headline anyway)

So the answer is yes, it is just Liz. Jolly good. No worries.

[OwlHoot]

Stop saying "no worries"! I don't care if you're worried or not!

2022-03-13 Is it just me? Or is ‘no worries’ an utterly infuriating phrase? asks LIZ HOGGARD

Usually the answer to a Daily Fail headline question is "No". But this is an exception (well the second question in the headline anyway)

[courtg9000]

About 10 years ago I did a lot of work in the Czech Republic.
The standard of english amongst my native czech colleagues was rather good but with one exception which would always do my head in.
Where we would use the word "soon" they would use the phrase "in the next time"!
As I said it used to do my head in!

[d000hg]

I suppose in some languages, there would be no ambiguity. In written English, one could theoretically come up with a construct for this especially in the post-handwritten world but we seem to muddle along.

[OwlHoot]

She met former Love Island star Zara McDermott and discussed her experience of revenge porn and assault.

I wonder how our reading impaired friend will cope with this:No apostrophes to help you out here, should something be added to language to clarify who "her" refers to? ..

"the latter's experience"

or for Gibbon:

the latters experience

The latter latter doesn't look quite right to me, but there you go

P.S. I wonder if the latter latter latter should be quoted

[d000hg]

I wonder how our reading impaired friend will cope with this:

Meanwhile, Camilla has carried on with her planned engagements, earlier visiting Paddington Haven, a sexual assault referral centre in West London.

She met former Love Island star Zara McDermott and discussed her experience of revenge porn and assault.

No apostrophes to help you out here, should something be added to language to clarify who "her" refers to?

Although presumably any revenge porn incident involving Camilla is revenge on the person being forced to watch it

[Gibbon]

Oh, seamless.

We should set your posts to some Benny Hill music.

That would be your level so feel free, do post when you've done it so we can all hear.

Actually forget it. When you can argue without insult come back.

[jamesbrown]

FFS! (edit) got it! You have to read out loud!

Oh, seamless.

We should set your posts to some Benny Hill music.

[Gibbon]

I was merely suggesting that you sound like a ginormous, pettifogging bellend. Perhaps it's just your ginormous-bellend posting style and, in reality, you're a perfectly harmless common or garden moron when engaged in the spoken word.

Either way, no need to get your clown pants in a twist.

I refer to my previous post. You must do well on mumsnet.

BTW how does the written word 'sound'? FFS! (edit) got it! You have to read out loud!

[jamesbrown]

Is that really the best you have got! God, the nights must fly by!

I was merely suggesting that you sound like a ginormous, pettifogging bellend. Perhaps it's just your ginormous-bellend posting style and, in reality, you're a perfectly harmless common or garden moron when engaged in the spoken word.

Either way, no need to get your clown pants in a twist.

[Gibbon]

Some self-proclaimed anti-pedants are the most pedantic cretins I have come across; for example, Oliver Kamm, who writes for The Times.

Just sayin'.

Is that really the best you have got! God, the nights must fly by!

[jamesbrown]

Some self-proclaimed anti-pedants are the most pedantic cretins I have come across; for example, Oliver Kamm, who writes for The Times.

Just sayin'.

[Gibbon]

Because when people speak, they add pauses - they don't need to say "apostrophe". Also, the reader might be partially sighted and using a screen reader, where punctuation informs the context.

(who wants to "starting a sentence with Because"?)

They don't add pauses for a contraction, the shortening is deliberate to aid brevity, maybe, just maybe, you're actually, well maybe, thinking about, probably, commas?

[Gibbon]

Have you evern tried to help your Uncle Jack off a horse?

If you didnt have an uncle Jack it wouldn't make sense would it, its a extreme example to stretch language where it does not belong and obvs. beloved by pedants.

[Paralytic]

Context fecking hell M didnt expect you to roll out that trite example. Spoken it would make perfect sense, why should the written word be different?

Because when people speak, they add pauses - they don't need to say "apostrophe". Also, the reader might be partially sighted and using a screen reader, where punctuation informs the context.

(who wants to add "starting a sentence with Because" to the list?)