• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hogarth was a brexiteer!"

Collapse

  • Gibbon
    replied
    I going to the exhibition on Tuesday, will report back. Did some Hogarth with OU so will see how perceptions have changed.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Are you really this dim? I worry for you, I really do.
    To paraphrase a line from The Lord of the Rings: What can one do in the face of such reckless dimness? (And utter lack of self-awareness).

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post

    Hogarth is English. Of course the curators and observers are talking about his representation of Britain in this period ... that's what his art represents. If he had been painting Nigerian society, then the critique would be about that society. Are you really this dim? I worry for you, I really do.


    I read the link from the curators as this is what they said, not what the Torygraph or Wail have chosen to make a story about
    Having difficulty understanding multiple contexts in an argument? OK I will get the crayons.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Indeed it was the Telegraph.

    Cancel culture is a little fluid in its meaning but many of the actions being performed now are designed to criminalise the actions of historical figures based on today's opinions and laws. I'm all for judging history, but it is a different country.

    Also the discussions about slavery and Empire are framed in restrictive lens of a short period when the west ruled the world. If we removed the UK from that period of history how would the world look now? Would we all speak Nigerian? I suspect it would be Spanish, German or French. if we removed the west I suspect we would all be speaking Chinese or Arabic.

    The idea that Cancel culture resulting in no-platforming is a good thing or likely to change entrenched minds is naïve.
    Hogarth is English. Of course the curators and observers are talking about his representation of Britain in this period ... that's what his art represents. If he had been painting Nigerian society, then the critique would be about that society. Are you really this dim? I worry for you, I really do.

    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    In the remote chance warty actually reads the story the comments are in the labels and from the mouths of the curators. Linking to a web page of the catalogue is not going to get you out of the hole you dug.
    I read the link from the curators as this is what they said, not what the Torygraph or Wail have chosen to make a story about

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    The hole he dug?
    Well you were down there with him but he was the one who got snotty.



    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Linking to a web page of the catalogue is not going to get you out of the hole you dug.
    The hole he dug?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    The Wail took the story from the Torygraph, and it has been picked up by multiple outlets around the world, some claiming that it is evidence of "Cancel Culture" - which appears to be newspeak for "wanting to talk openly about something MORE", rather than the opposite, which would be "cancelling any discussion that might be contrary or offend those who are merry in their ignorance"
    Indeed it was the Telegraph.

    Cancel culture is a little fluid in its meaning but many of the actions being performed now are designed to criminalise the actions of historical figures based on today's opinions and laws. I'm all for judging history, but it is a different country.

    Also the discussions about slavery and Empire are framed in restrictive lens of a short period when the west ruled the world. If we removed the UK from that period of history how would the world look now? Would we all speak Nigerian? I suspect it would be Spanish, German or French. if we removed the west I suspect we would all be speaking Chinese or Arabic.

    The idea that Cancel culture resulting in no-platforming is a good thing or likely to change entrenched minds is naïve.

    In the remote chance warty actually reads the story the comments are in the labels and from the mouths of the curators. Linking to a web page of the catalogue is not going to get you out of the hole you dug.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post

    You do realise that if it's not in the Wail, then it can't be true in Vetty's little world
    The Wail took the story from the Torygraph, and it has been picked up by multiple outlets around the world, some claiming that it is evidence of "Cancel Culture" - which appears to be newspeak for "wanting to talk openly about something MORE", rather than the opposite, which would be "cancelling any discussion that might be contrary or offend those who are merry in their ignorance"

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    Nope, they said something in the ellipsis which was omitted by the wail as it probably makes more sense than the phrase "seems to respond to Brexit", but by putting Brexit in there, it gets all the flakes worked up.

    Here, have a read of what is actually being said by the Tate, and not what triggered you:
    https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tat...hibition-guide
    You do realise that if it's not in the Wail, then it can't be true in Vetty's little world

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    So they said we changed the exhibition in response to Brexit by portraying him as cosmopolitan and European rather than the xenophobe the art world normally think of him as. Seems they do suggest he is.
    Nope, they said something in the ellipsis which was omitted by the wail as it probably makes more sense than the phrase "seems to respond to Brexit", but by putting Brexit in there, it gets all the flakes worked up.

    Here, have a read of what is actually being said by the Tate, and not what triggered you:
    https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tat...hibition-guide

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    They don't.
    So, not a Brexiteer, nor an anti-European racist Xenophobe.

    What does seem woke is the additions of little signs saying that the economy of the time was funded by slavery. Oh. Ok. And?
    So they said we changed the exhibition in response to Brexit by portraying him as cosmopolitan and European rather than the xenophobe the art world normally think of him as. Seems they do suggest he is.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    How they get from Hogarth he was a satirist who documented the unusual or immoral things he saw around him including drunkenness, depravity and immorality to he was anti - European racist Xenophobe its hard to fathom.
    They don't.
    The curators also said the show 'obviously... seems to respond to Brexit' by portraying Hogarth in a 'cosmopolitan, outward-looking' fashion, rather than as an 'insular patriot' and 'xenophobe', which they claim he is often viewed as.
    So, not a Brexiteer, nor an anti-European racist Xenophobe.

    What does seem woke is the additions of little signs saying that the economy of the time was funded by slavery. Oh. Ok. And?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post

    Do you get the irony of calling out those who get triggered by something 'woke', when you're constantly getting triggered yourself?

    No wonder you have high blood pressure.
    Not triggered - amused they are obviously terminally stupid. They would make great posters here!

    How they get from Hogarth he was a satirist who documented the unusual or immoral things he saw around him including drunkenness, depravity and immorality to he was anti - European racist Xenophobe its hard to fathom.

    Its like there is a woke manual
    1. select white middle/upper class British white male heterosexual historical figure.
    2. Find anywhere he interacted with slaves (despite it being as legal as heroin was then).
    3. Decide without evidence he must be a disgusting racist white slaver.
    4. Ignore any transgressions by anyone else in the period.
    5. scream at anyone who disagrees.

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...paintings.html





    Can anyone tell us what those nice Germans, French, Belgians, Spanish & Portuguese people were buying from Africa around that time?


    Do you get the irony of calling out those who get triggered by something 'woke', when you're constantly getting triggered yourself?

    No wonder you have high blood pressure.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Hogarth was a brexiteer!

    Hogarth was a brexiteer!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...paintings.html

    Woke curators target Hogarth: Famous cartoonist's depictions of 18th century Britain now come with notes about 'sexual violence and slavery' in new Tate Britain exhibition
    • Tate Britain exhibition highlights alleged slavery links in William Hogarth's work
    • The painting A Midnight Modern Conversation is one of those mentioned
    • Note says the alcohol and tobacco are linked to 'exploitation and slavery'
    • The new Hogarth and Europe display showcases sixty of the artist's works
    They draw attention to one painting, The Discovery, which shows a semi-naked black prostitute on a bed whilst four white men surround her, calling it 'explicitly racist'.

    The curators also said the show 'obviously... seems to respond to Brexit' by portraying Hogarth in a 'cosmopolitan, outward-looking' fashion, rather than as an 'insular patriot' and 'xenophobe', which they claim he is often viewed as.

    However, the historians added that they are unable to give an objective account of Hogarth's work because the exhibition is a 'Eurocentric project'.
    Can anyone tell us what those nice Germans, French, Belgians, Spanish & Portuguese people were buying from Africa around that time?



Working...
X