• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Audi E Tron Business Lease - time to go electric!"

Collapse

  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    I would have thought the operating company rather than TfL should carry the insurance?
    Possibly it can be an umbrella if the vehicles are rented/sponsored.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    I would have thought the operating company rather than TfL should carry the insurance?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post

    ",... in addition to self-insuring". With buses. TFL hold a bond for a large sum to cover accidents, in other words, they insure themselves.
    So they are insured then?


    However AIUI in this case the self insurance is for TFL's risk, if their bus driver hits a traffic light and runs over a pedestrian the Third party insurance may pay for the cost of replacing the traffic light and the Pedestrian' s injuries. TFL pay for repairing the bus. The risk on a bond is unlimited so killing a few pedestrians (a common occurrence) would run through £500,000 rather quickly.

    https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/fleet-ma...ncing-the-risk
    oh look an expert..
    The term ‘self-insurance’ can often be misunderstood and mistaken for the scheme which involves placing a £500,000 bond with the Government (see panel, page 30).

    Instead, self-insurance can also mean taking out a third-party insurance policy so the fleet takes the risk of any collision damage to its own vehicles.

    “Virtually no business on the planet actually completely self-insures – the risks of having to pay a multi-million pound loss are too great for almost any commercial enterprise to bear,” says Peter Blanc, group chief executive of insurance broker Aston Scott Group.

    “The term ‘self-insurance’ should really be called ‘risk sharing’ as that is a more accurate description of the arrangement,” Blanc adds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    FTFY - they buy Third party insurance

    https://content.tfl.gov.uk/fc-201703...ce-renewal.pdf
    ",... in addition to self-insuring". With buses. TFL hold a bond for a large sum to cover accidents, in other words, they insure themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post

    Trivia: London buses are partially self insured.
    FTFY - they buy Third party insurance

    https://content.tfl.gov.uk/fc-201703...ce-renewal.pdf

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post

    Trivia: London buses are not insured.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    I hope the Audi can tell if you drive off with a door open

    https://metro.co.uk/2021/08/18/londo...door-15113235/

    Trivia: London buses are not insured.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Good job you didn't opt for a Chevy.

    https://arstechnica.com/cars/2021/08...lty-batteries/

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    I hope the Audi can tell if you drive off with a door open

    https://metro.co.uk/2021/08/18/londo...door-15113235/


    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post

    The issue is going to be domestic heating.....
    and transportation.

    The 2019 figures are massaged in such ways to be impossible to get a clear answer, but it appears that over the last dozen years, renewables businesses haven't supported the "right" people enough.

    The total for "non-CO2 producing" energy is about 19%.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post

    So what other forms of energy are you referring to?
    The issue is going to be domestic heating.....

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post


    You've went off and got me numbers for electricity. I said energy.

    These are the kinds of obvious traps they set for children doing basic physics exams.

    So what other forms of energy are you referring to?

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    I mean the US is murdering forests to export wood here by ship, I think Germany is using loads of US wood in energy. And that is all lovely and green.

    But you start burning some local wood in a log burner for heat rather than using gas, and you get these environmental groups, probably funded by the energy sector saying it's a major source of pollution

    Hearths on fire: UK residents incensed by pollution from wood burners | Air pollution | The Guardian

    ...and people actually take this in and nobody questions it. Nuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    A burning issue: biomass is the biggest source of renewable energy consumed in the UK - Office for National Statistics

    So that is the official figures. Reached 10% in 2017 and bio was 40% of that

    I'm sure that it's higher now, they are always building these things, I doubt though non bio renewables have doubled in 4 years. But the "we're going to have so much of this green stuff in a generation we need massive battery farms" initial comment is clearly nonsense.

    Would need to have more than 10 of what we have now and considering turbines only last for 25 years then it's gibberish.

    'Green energy' is a total scam.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    Provide data to back up your claim of 10% renewable energy.
    Domestic heating via gas is going to be the main factor here.

    Trying to find suitable figures on google is however something I've failed to do quickly so meh - I'll agree with minestrone is my quick results point at a figure well below 10% once you start looking at gas heating.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X