Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
I did find it amazing that womens' groups were actively campaigning against retirement age parity because it was 'discriminatory' to be treated the same.
It is the victim mentality. I believe I have been discriminated against therefore I must have been wronged despite logic & evidence.
Then it was evened up.....in the name of fairness.
Since then we have been inundated with cries of indignation from the relatively small number of women who were most affected by having their rights equalised.
Go figure.
I did find it amazing that womens' groups were actively campaigning against retirement age parity because it was 'discriminatory' to be treated the same.
What's the difference between a mans career and that of a woman?
Up until relatively recently, 5 years.
Then it was evened up.....in the name of fairness.
Since then we have been inundated with cries of indignation from the relatively small number of women who were most affected by having their rights equalised.
What's the difference between a mans career and that of a woman?
If they have an equal financial reward or a reward skewed towards the female, the female is willing to give up the role of full time mother and her partner willing to step up then there needn't be.
If as I suspect her husband pays the bills and her clothing business makes very little (otherwise we would be informed they are in poverty because her clothing business is failing, its basically pin money) then it makes sense for her to stop work to home school. I am not quite sure why the husband can't contribute to the home schooling I assist after work and I have a fairly busy job.
As mentioned before Mrs V & I discussed this before we had kids and made a decision that my salary would support us and that meant Mrs V did the majority of the childcare while I worked long hours & travelled to chase the money. If she had started a business that paid all the bills and I could give up work then we would discuss it again.
My kids are all likely to go to university and study for well paid jobs so hopefully the discussion may have a different conclusion with their future partners. A small number of couples are now either equal pay or skewed towards the female.
The reason for some ladies not being able to have it all is because the universe isn't fair. Sorry. There are plenty of people out of a job completely and boldly carrying on.
What's the difference between a mans career and that of a woman?
Plenty of areas that can still be addressed on both sides if you want to pick it apart but that's not the point. This woman in this climate is not an example of any of them.
What on earth does she want? There is a world wide pandemic on and she has the flexibility to homeschool where he doesn't. I mean, she works from home already. And not having any time to do any of her, very flexible work, due to home schooling all day. Utter tulipe. What on earth does she want? What does she think will make the policy less sexist?
None of the recommendations would work for someone in her position anyway.
There is definitely a case where the difference between men and womens careers can be addressed for sure but that womans situation is not it.
That tulipe reporting is worth of the rags, not BBC
Last edited by northernladuk; 9 February 2021, 10:09.
Government policies have "repeatedly skewed towards men", a committee of MPs has said in a report on the impact of coronavirus on men and women.
Committee chair Caroline Nokes said the government had "repeatedly failed to consider" the labour market and caring inequalities faced by women.
The report makes 20 recommendations including making it easier for staff to get flexible working arrangements.
The government said it had spent over £200bn on job support schemes.
"Throughout the pandemic this government has done whatever it takes to protect lives and livelihoods, and will continue to do so," a spokesperson said.
Leave a comment: