• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Priti Oops..

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Priti Oops.."

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    The reason this happened is the utter contempt the UK shows towards IT. The Victorians had the right idea - change things. The UK needs to accept that change is good. And since 1st January that is much easier.
    It's because the UK is still a country where "Well educated" means "Studied classics at Oxford or Cambridge".

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    The reason this happened is the utter contempt the UK shows towards IT. The Victorians had the right idea - change things. The UK needs to accept that change is good. And since 1st January that is much easier.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    A Trumpian answer if ever...You could get a job as his spokesman with that non-answer
    Nah he will be working for Boris doing a daily briefing.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Public sector has always been crap. When I was in a company that did contracts for them back in the 80s, they always added a significant percentage to the estimated cost on the grounds that there would be various cockups requiring significant changes. Recall them complaining that a function was about 3 lines longer than their arbitrary limit, the fact that it performed the necessary task as succinctly as possible was irrelevant.
    A Trumpian answer if ever...You could get a job as his spokesman with that non-answer

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    What would you have said if it had been a Labour government in power and this had happened?
    Public sector has always been crap. When I was in a company that did contracts for them back in the 80s, they always added a significant percentage to the estimated cost on the grounds that there would be various cockups requiring significant changes. Recall them complaining that a function was about 3 lines longer than their arbitrary limit, the fact that it performed the necessary task as succinctly as possible was irrelevant.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    They hosted it with the Post office system!
    But chose 2nd class delivery and it was so late it was returned to sender, and the data was gone. True story.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    They outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.

    That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.

    If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.

    They hosted it with the Post office system!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    The Fujitsu system is running on Adabas. It doesn't have the required purge functionality. That was produced inhouse. Records must be removed and not accessible to the police or other services.
    Adabas? Not a variant mutation acronym of Acab?

    Re Fujitsu. My view of them may be skewed by how a public sector client I was contracting at used them to outsource a CRM 'solve all our problems' solution () that quickly became very expensive and undeliverable resulting in der management outsourcing the whole IT dept. I'm sure it turned out all right in the end.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    They outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.

    That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.

    If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.
    The Fujitsu system is running on Adabas. It doesn't have the required purge functionality. That was produced inhouse. Records must be removed and not accessible to the police or other services.

    Leave a comment:


  • tazdevil
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    They outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.

    That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.

    If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.
    Never delete is the way to go, write everything to a time series database before purging old stuff from the DBMS then have that replicated across at least three servers in different data centres run by different organisations. Can't be too careful these days If the numpty IT team doesn't do for the data then Amazon will close your AWS account cos it doesn't like you

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Is that true? Need a database expert to comment.
    They outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.

    That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.

    If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    there is no way to know how much stuff has been deleted
    Is that true? Need a database expert to comment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I think they initialli got Diane Abbott to count the missing records. Seems to be 400,000+ ....
    They can only guess as there is no way to know how much stuff has been deleted if there's not trace of it, otherwise it wouldn't be deleted.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Yeh, any error by public services is the fault of the current Tory government and the shadow Home Secretary would come up with solutions immediately. Typical Guardian drivel.
    What would you have said if it had been a Labour government in power and this had happened?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark Black
    replied
    Police probes compromised after computer records deleted - BBC News

    The deletion of the records has been blamed on a coding error.
    OK.. Who was it...?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X