Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Priti Oops..
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Priti Oops.."
Collapse
-
-
The reason this happened is the utter contempt the UK shows towards IT. The Victorians had the right idea - change things. The UK needs to accept that change is good. And since 1st January that is much easier.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostPublic sector has always been crap. When I was in a company that did contracts for them back in the 80s, they always added a significant percentage to the estimated cost on the grounds that there would be various cockups requiring significant changes. Recall them complaining that a function was about 3 lines longer than their arbitrary limit, the fact that it performed the necessary task as succinctly as possible was irrelevant.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostWhat would you have said if it had been a Labour government in power and this had happened?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostThey hosted it with the Post office system!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostThey outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.
That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.
If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.
They hosted it with the Post office system!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostThe Fujitsu system is running on Adabas. It doesn't have the required purge functionality. That was produced inhouse. Records must be removed and not accessible to the police or other services.
Re Fujitsu. My view of them may be skewed by how a public sector client I was contracting at used them to outsource a CRM 'solve all our problems' solution () that quickly became very expensive and undeliverable resulting in der management outsourcing the whole IT dept. I'm sure it turned out all right in the end.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostThey outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.
That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.
If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostThey outsourced it to Fujitsu who likely made a right dogs dinner of it, making the recovery process somewhat harder than an undelete action such as rolling back the transaction log when the fat fingered script runner deleted the wrong stuff.
That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.
If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostIs that true? Need a database expert to comment.
That's assuming they are using a proper database and not some NoSQL bullshine.
If they really want the data to stick around then use something immutable like a blockchain.
Leave a comment:
-
there is no way to know how much stuff has been deleted
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI think they initialli got Diane Abbott to count the missing records. Seems to be 400,000+ ....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostYeh, any error by public services is the fault of the current Tory government and the shadow Home Secretary would come up with solutions immediately. Typical Guardian drivel.
Leave a comment:
-
Police probes compromised after computer records deleted - BBC News
The deletion of the records has been blamed on a coding error.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: