• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Killer motorways.

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Killer motorways."

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    Depends on how you prove they entered the lane after it was closed, or refused to leave it in a timely manner.
    Simples. The first flashing red light should mean "leave lane now", and a solid red light "you should have left by now, and are liable for a fine"

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You'd assume all the emergency vehicles have dash-cams, if they submit the footage of every car they got stuck behind would they get fines in the post? I am fairly sure even footage submitted by the public can be used in this way
    Perhaps rocket launchers?

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post

    Can't be too hard. If it's been shut for 8 minutes and they haven't managed to merge
    As I tend to refuse to let BMW drivers in because they always behave like lane closures apply to other people, this could prove good fun

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    Depends on how you prove they entered the lane after it was closed, or refused to leave it in a timely manner.
    Can't be too hard. If it's been shut for 8 minutes and they haven't managed to merge

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    You'd assume all the emergency vehicles have dash-cams, if they submit the footage of every car they got stuck behind would they get fines in the post? I am fairly sure even footage submitted by the public can be used in this way
    Depends on how you prove they entered the lane after it was closed, or refused to leave it in a timely manner.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    You'd assume all the emergency vehicles have dash-cams, if they submit the footage of every car they got stuck behind would they get fines in the post? I am fairly sure even footage submitted by the public can be used in this way

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by MonkeysUncle View Post
    https://metro.co.uk/2021/09/27/one-i...king-15321887/

    "As many as one in ten safety cameras monitoring the UK’s smart motorways are either broken, misted up or facing the wrong way, it has been reported."

    "Workers monitoring the feeds were secretly filmed muttering to themselves ‘we’ve got no signals, you’re all going to die’ and ‘the whole system’s crashed’."

    Good thing you cant buy any petrol might end up dying if you go on the motorway!
    I saw similar stories a few weeks ago.

    DfT argue that smart motorways lead to fewer deaths than on conventional but they 'could' put the same level of surveillance on normal motorways and keep the hard shoulder and you'd get the best of both worlds.

    Leave a comment:


  • MonkeysUncle
    replied
    https://metro.co.uk/2021/09/27/one-i...king-15321887/

    "As many as one in ten safety cameras monitoring the UK’s smart motorways are either broken, misted up or facing the wrong way, it has been reported."

    "Workers monitoring the feeds were secretly filmed muttering to themselves ‘we’ve got no signals, you’re all going to die’ and ‘the whole system’s crashed’."

    Good thing you cant buy any petrol might end up dying if you go on the motorway!

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I notice the same on the M3. Red X on the outside is an invitation to the BMW's & Co to use it exclusively. .
    If you're on your M3, presumably you joined in?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    17 minutes to be spotted and 17 minutes to be recovered.

    So nearly 20 mins of trucks hurtling towards you at 70 mph and then nearly another 20 hoping people read the signs properly. Thst doesn't mention how long to actually clear it.

    How did that get past any kind of risk assessment??
    Trucks and large vans should be limited to 60mph.

    Mind you being in the next lane and seeing an HGV having to suddenly brake on a dual carriageway near me at 50mph due to the driver not realising there are lots of random and tight turns....

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    17 minutes to be spotted and 17 minutes to be recovered.

    So nearly 20 mins of trucks hurtling towards you at 70 mph and then nearly another 20 hoping people read the signs properly. Thst doesn't mention how long to actually clear it.

    How did that get past any kind of risk assessment??
    Money.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by MonkeysUncle View Post
    Didnt they do a report last year (or maybe the year before) where it showed that smart motorways were worse then normal in terms of deaths.

    Edit: 38 killed on smart motorways in last five years - BBC News
    17 minutes to be spotted and 17 minutes to be recovered.

    So nearly 20 mins of trucks hurtling towards you at 70 mph and then nearly another 20 hoping people read the signs properly. Thst doesn't mention how long to actually clear it.

    How did that get past any kind of risk assessment??

    Leave a comment:


  • MonkeysUncle
    replied
    Didnt they do a report last year (or maybe the year before) where it showed that smart motorways were worse then normal in terms of deaths.

    Edit: 38 killed on smart motorways in last five years - BBC News

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    It seems to me, they need to combine the lane closure signs to smart laser blasters to vapourise the morons who don't keep to the rules.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    Oh I've done years of Leeds to Preston, flippin awful, you get a sense of who to avoid. If I didn't get to the Oldham junction by 06:15 a 70min commute morphed into 2-3 hrs. Sometimes could avoid trouble using the M66, Grane Road and M65. They need to extend the M65 to meet the A1 around Harrogate as was the original intention. When they built the M62 it was as much maligned as HS2 "who's going to use it was the rallying cry", now days everyone! Trouble is its a pinch point for traffic traversing the pennines, and many of them in winter are road freight avoiding the A66 going up to Glasgow etc.
    Hardly surprising given the A66 is single carriageway for most of the bits between the M6 and Brough and Bowes / Barnard Castle to Scotch Corner (although the road is due to be upgraded).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X