• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "BOOM: Covid Vaccine Number 2"

Collapse

  • ladymuck
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The one that will link us to 5G...
    That's how Bill Gates will know what we're thinking? Or something...

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Which vaccine has the microchips in it?

    The one that will link us to 5G...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Which vaccine has the microchips in it?

    Leave a comment:


  • FIERCE TANK BATTLE
    replied
    Damn, see I would feel really reluctant to take a vaccine that has been tested on 5 people. I thought maybe a trial would be a few hundred? Maybe a thousand?

    I had no idea that gave it to 15,000 people as a test! That's a bit more reassuring. Thanks for the link.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paralytic
    replied
    Originally posted by FIERCE TANK BATTLE View Post
    I'm no maths genius, but 94.5% effacacy would mean 4.725 people didn't get the 'rona after taking it, wouldn't it?

    How'd they figure that out?
    BBC explains it better Moderna: Covid vaccine shows nearly 95% protection - BBC News

    The trial involved 30,000 people in the US with half being given two doses of the vaccine, four weeks apart. The rest had dummy injections.
    The analysis was based on the first 95 to develop Covid-19 symptoms.
    Only five of the Covid cases were in people given the vaccine, 90 were in those given the dummy treatment. The company says the vaccine is protecting 94.5% of people.
    The data also shows there were 11 cases of severe Covid in the trial, but none happened in people who were immunised.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by jayn200 View Post
    To get the exact figure you'd have to know how many participants in each group, it might not be the same. I haven't seen how many, not sure if that information is out there.
    May be more information on this link -

    https://techcrunch.com/2020/11/16/mo...rXwIMpzY53ChRy

    Leave a comment:


  • jayn200
    replied
    Originally posted by FIERCE TANK BATTLE View Post
    I'm no maths genius, but 94.5% effacacy would mean 4.725 people didn't get the 'rona after taking it, wouldn't it?

    How'd they figure that out?
    To get the exact figure you'd have to know how many participants in each group, it might not be the same. I haven't seen how many, not sure if that information is out there.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Apparently Matt Hancock said several months ago that there was no need to order any of this one because the government would do a much better job of creating a vaccine anyway, or something equally dumb
    No Tory MP was and is linked to Moderna more likely.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Apparently Matt Hancock said several months ago that there was no need to order any of this one because the government would do a much better job of creating a vaccine anyway, or something equally dumb

    Leave a comment:


  • FIERCE TANK BATTLE
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    An interim analysis released on Monday, and based on 95 patients with confirmed Covid infections, found the candidate vaccine has an efficacy of 94.5%. The company said it now plans to apply to the US regulator, the Food and Drug Administration, for emergency-use authorisation in the coming weeks. In the trial, 90 of the patients received the placebo with the remaining five the vaccine.
    I'm no maths genius, but 94.5% effacacy would mean 4.725 people didn't get the 'rona after taking it, wouldn't it?

    How'd they figure that out?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    this is what has been ordered:

    100m doses of University of Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine (in phase 3 clinical trials)40m doses of BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine (in phase 3 clinical trials)
    60m doses of Novavax vaccine (in phase 3 clinical trials)
    60m doses of Valneva vaccine (in pre-clinical trials)
    60m doses of GSK/Sanofi Pasteur vaccine (in phase 1 clinical trials)
    30m doses of Janssen vaccine (in phase 2 clinical trials)

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I just wonder how much the US general public will have to pay to be vaccinated.

    A bit more than we did to get Boris laid.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    I just wonder how much the US general public will have to pay to be vaccinated.
    This is why the Oxford vaccine (or any other one) that is cheap is needed. We need most of the world vaccinated not just the wealthy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    I just wonder how much the US general public will have to pay to be vaccinated.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X