• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The Matrix is about...."

Collapse

  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    More interesting would be where does a sense of gender lie in the order of development, as sense of self emerges? Is it one of the first things or one of the last key components of identity?
    Not read around that bit.

    Though you must know/have met children up to the age of 8 who decide whether someone is a boy or girl, man or woman by what they wear, hair style etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Babies and young toddlers don't have a concept of gender and sex. Babies don't even know they are separate individuals for the first few months and only at around 18 months do they realise that other people have different thoughts to them.
    More interesting would be where does a sense of gender lie in the order of development, as sense of self emerges? Is it one of the first things or one of the last key components of identity?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paralytic
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Babies and young toddlers don't have a concept of gender and sex. Babies don't even know they are separate individuals for the first few months and only at around 18 months do they realise that other people have different thoughts to them.
    There's a guy/gal/other over not the stock market thread with the same issue!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    A fictional character? Tricky.

    he is only fictional in your mind - take the red pill...

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Not fictional, you just haven't imagined you've them

    That said half the people here are fictional characters.
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    You regularly talk to a fictional character.
    Not fictional, you just haven't met them

    That said half the people here are fictional characters.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    A fictional character? Tricky.
    You regularly talk to a fictional character.

    Leave a comment:


  • wattaj
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    ...I do have to say, on the purely superficial level Lana and Lilly are about the least convincing trans women, they look like little Britain characters. I thought the photo I saw was a joke for a second.
    Allow me to introduce you to Alex Drummond; a "lesbian" who sits on Stonewall's "Trans Advisor Group".

    See also, Magdalen Bern's excellent take-down of this nonsense: Alex / Transgender UK - YouTube
    Last edited by wattaj; 10 August 2020, 14:02. Reason: Clarity

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Tell Neo that.
    A fictional character? Tricky.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    So the Wachowski brothers are now sisters. That seems more interesting than any Matrix talk,

    First I've heard about a 4th Matrix movie. So Neo will now also be trans?
    I hadn't heard they were, but agreed that has to be pretty rare. It is hardly a big leap to that understanding of the film though - pretty thin disguise in hindsight.

    Matrix 4 has been in the works for quite some time, with most of the big original cast names. I am now wondering if the film will just be a thin veneer for 2.5 hours of trans apologetics dressed as a Sci Fi film, but I do think the idea of a character with different genders would've been quite interesting.

    I do have to say, on the purely superficial level Lana and Lilly are about the least convincing trans women, they look like little Britain characters. I thought the photo I saw was a joke for a second.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    It's interesting that the more prominant people to change gender (afaik) are men beyond 50.

    Bruce Jenner (Olympic decathlete in the earlier life), Robert Millar (pro cyclist in the earlier life), and now the Wachowskis.

    Maybe it's more widespread than my limited knowledge so I'm only seeing a very small snapshot of the bigger picture, otherwise it seems to be a mid life crisis thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Dead naming. It's a real shame that some individuals feel the need to blank out the part of their life before they decided they were a different gender.
    Tell Neo that.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    I'm more interested in how people react to the authors. It's interesting though - particularly the deadnaming re Mr Anderson / Neo.
    Dead naming. It's a real shame that some individuals feel the need to blank out the part of their life before they decided they were a different gender.

    If someone misnames me, I just tell them "that's not my name". What I may have called myself 30 years ago isn't really relevant. "That girl was a man was". The correct response is "So what?". I first encountered a transsexual back in 1977. Even then most people couldn't give a toss.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Not really. I thought is was good sci-fi because the interpretation is far wider. But if you want to interpret as being solely about gender being an artificial construct go for it - which is still up for debate - then go for it. The authors' interpretation is often not the best. That's why creativity is so cool.
    I'm more interested in how people react to the authors. It's interesting though - particularly the deadnaming re Mr Anderson / Neo.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Kind of like gender, eh?
    Not really. I thought is was good sci-fi because the interpretation is far wider. But if you want to interpret as being solely about gender being an artificial construct go for it - which is still up for debate - then go for it. The authors' interpretation is often not the best. That's why creativity is so cool.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X