• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Self Sufficiency

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Self Sufficiency"

Collapse

  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by dsc View Post
    You can't sterilise single use PPE as a) some of it is not suitable for it (like masks) b) you can never make sure it's been properly sterilised and that it's not worn out ie. can be used again. There's multi use PPE that you can use, like full facial masks with reusable / changeable filters, but things like gloves / gowns go in the bin as the risk of transfering other crap to other patients is far too great.

    That of course didn't stop Public Health England from lowering the ppe requirements for surgical gowns and they are saying you can just wear plastic aprons as gowns are not available at most hospitals (so the requirement is aligned with what equipment is available rather than what is safe, wait a few more days and they'll be saying it's perfectly safe to just wear shorts and a baseball cap).
    Same reasoning behind the advice on whether to wear face masks in public, driven by lack of supply rather then the actual health benefits.

    Coronavirus: Masks for public 'could put NHS supplies at risk' - BBC News

    Unless wearing the right quality mask, that is in demand by the medics, then at best it will only suppress (to varying degrees depending on its quality) spreading the virus if you have it, it won't stop you catching the virus. A mask alone isn't enough to stop the risk of catching it, needs careful handling and eye protection too.

    The one scenario where face masks in public (particularly confined spaces such as public transport or shops) is worthwhile is if asymptomatic, so wearing one of suitable quality will reduce the spreading. If symptomatic (fever, cough, ...) then shouldn't be out anyway.

    Hopefully as the vulnerable need to be protected until a vaccine is available (months away at best) the supply of suitable protection kit to the public will be addressed.

    Provide each vulnerable person a full hazmat suit and easy to follow instructions on how to disinfect it after each wearing outside.

    Provide everyone with easy free or cheap access to suitable grade masks and eye protection so normal social mingling can occur while trying to also observe social distancing, as not everywhere is spacious enough for that such as enclosed narrow paths.

    Looks like May is when the lockdown will be eased so time for them to get their act together and address the above to ensure the efforts so far are not unwound, while also ensuring there is enough kit in the UK for both the medics, care workers, and public.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    There was me thinking this thread was going to be about The Good Life:



    mmm Felicity Kendall!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dsc
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    I imagine the issue with lack of PPE being made in the UK is not so much the lack of manufacturing facilities and materials but the regulations, red tape, and 'oh we can't do that it's not establushed procedure'. Can't have something churned out from a new supplier without being approved after extensive testing. Seems they are more worried about that rubber stamp than recognising that plastic is plastic and rubber is rubber (or whatever the surgical gloves are made out of) and as long as it's non-porous is better than not having anything.

    At the same time the amount of single use PPE they're getting through on a daily basis is ridiculous. Surely some of that is fit for reuse after appropriate cleaning or steralisation. i.e. instead of just binning the stuff for recycling put it in storage for a week and any virus is dead anyway. Are there other viruses, bacteria, or fluids the medics come into contact with that need longer periods to become inactive and no risk? If so then that's the period the kit needs storing for before re-use and set up a circulation of kit over that timeframe. Alternatively some decontamination room like they use for full biohazards is surely not difficult to provide to the hospitals.

    Get the army in, they'd sort it out.
    You can't sterilise single use PPE as a) some of it is not suitable for it (like masks) b) you can never make sure it's been properly sterilised and that it's not worn out ie. can be used again. There's multi use PPE that you can use, like full facial masks with reusable / changeable filters, but things like gloves / gowns go in the bin as the risk of transfering other crap to other patients is far too great.

    That of course didn't stop Public Health England from lowering the ppe requirements for surgical gowns and they are saying you can just wear plastic aprons as gowns are not available at most hospitals (so the requirement is aligned with what equipment is available rather than what is safe, wait a few more days and they'll be saying it's perfectly safe to just wear shorts and a baseball cap).

    Leave a comment:


  • dsc
    replied
    Originally posted by HoofHearted View Post
    They might not be made of spare parts from a fridge but other than that it looks like you can
    Well they can help make parts, injection moulded elements, metal CNC made parts etc. but the whole assembly and testing is still bound by super strict rules. What if you make a 1000 ventilators a day and it turns out there's a flaw in them which makes patents choke on some plastic crap that's in the mechanism? There is no industry with such a direct impact on humans, sure if a pressure valve blows on an oil and gas site it might kill someone, but if you fail to spot something in pharma it will definitely kill / injure someone.

    Leave a comment:


  • HoofHearted
    replied
    Originally posted by dsc View Post
    you can't just make a ventilator out of spare parts from a fridge and start making thousands of them on a production line which was previously making engine parts. Ffs.
    They might not be made of spare parts from a fridge but other than that it looks like you can

    Firms including Siemens, Airbus, Ford and a number of Formula 1 teams worked with Penlon, a medical device maker, to adapt its ventilator so that it could be mass-produced at speed.

    Under normal circumstances, Penlon would only be able to make 50 to 60 ventilators a week.

    In line with updated MHRA rules, the ESO2 can also be switched on and off more easily, allowing liquid to be regularly drained from patients' lungs - something the sickest Covid-19 patients can require on an hourly basis.

    Dick Elsy, chair of the VentilatorChallengeUK consortium which is making the device, said it had undergone "stringent testing and clinical trials for the last two weeks".

    "Ventilators of this type are complex and critical pieces of medical equipment, so ensuring the absolute adherence to regulatory standards and meeting clinical needs were always our priorities," he said.

    Airbus' Broughton site, which makes wings for commercial aircraft, Ford's Dagenham engine factory and McLaren's Woking site are helping to produce the ESO2.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by dsc View Post
    I personally love all the "why can't the local trouser / sugar / bikini factory just start making PPE?". Same tulipe with ventilators and other equipment needed, as if any factory can just easily switch production and start churning out pharma equipment just because they already manufacture something. Pharma is most likely the most tightly controlled and monitored industry there is, you can't just make a ventilator out of spare parts from a fridge and start making thousands of them on a production line which was previously making engine parts. Ffs.

    Btw slow clap for the government for the whole PPE supply tulip show. If this isn't criminal then I don't know what is.
    I imagine the issue with lack of PPE being made in the UK is not so much the lack of manufacturing facilities and materials but the regulations, red tape, and 'oh we can't do that it's not establushed procedure'. Can't have something churned out from a new supplier without being approved after extensive testing. Seems they are more worried about that rubber stamp than recognising that plastic is plastic and rubber is rubber (or whatever the surgical gloves are made out of) and as long as it's non-porous is better than not having anything.

    At the same time the amount of single use PPE they're getting through on a daily basis is ridiculous. Surely some of that is fit for reuse after appropriate cleaning or steralisation. i.e. instead of just binning the stuff for recycling put it in storage for a week and any virus is dead anyway. Are there other viruses, bacteria, or fluids the medics come into contact with that need longer periods to become inactive and no risk? If so then that's the period the kit needs storing for before re-use and set up a circulation of kit over that timeframe. Alternatively some decontamination room like they use for full biohazards is surely not difficult to provide to the hospitals.

    Get the army in, they'd sort it out.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    There was me thinking this thread was going to be about The Good Life:

    Leave a comment:


  • dsc
    replied
    I personally love all the "why can't the local trouser / sugar / bikini factory just start making PPE?". Same tulipe with ventilators and other equipment needed, as if any factory can just easily switch production and start churning out pharma equipment just because they already manufacture something. Pharma is most likely the most tightly controlled and monitored industry there is, you can't just make a ventilator out of spare parts from a fridge and start making thousands of them on a production line which was previously making engine parts. Ffs.

    Btw slow clap for the government for the whole PPE supply tulip show. If this isn't criminal then I don't know what is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cirrus
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    A lot of that manufacturing is automated to high degree - but one needs materials in place, hard tomimagine cotton will be made on the UK.
    Hard to imagine a city would ever grow up with a name like Manchester; that would be known as Cottonopolis because of its domination of world cotton trade.

    Hard to imagine that people in far-away, third-world Peru could ever shift massive amounts of asparagus to a city with a name like Manchester.

    No, you're right. In the UK we can only ever hope to make jam, scones and clotted cream.

    And pork pies.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Hardly practical or economic for every nation to be self sufficient in everything but, all the same, it may be a good idea to have some core production and skills with regard to essential things, and be better equipped to tackle crises.
    Our problems started when too many kids were pushed down the academia route - a degree has lost its worth compared to what it used to be and isn't the differentiator it used to be. Just a debt vehicle these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Hardly practical or economic for every nation to be self sufficient in everything but, all the same, it may be a good idea to have some core production and skills with regard to essential things, and be better equipped to tackle crises.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Complete middle-class North London twaddle. These ejjits think that anything not involving smacking a laptop for a few hours a day is unskilled work that can be picked up in an afternoon.

    Office workers are completely unskilled in trade work. Manufacturing relies on 3-4 year apprenticeships (and sometimes longer than that) to train people in the skills needed.

    Even relatively low-skilled work can take months of training and experience to get up-to-speed with effective use of tooling and quality production.
    Depends who it is and what it is. Having done factory work, I can say that some people get it easier than others - you generally have to keep an eye on the lad who actually goes to the Engineers' Room and asks for a long stand.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Complete middle-class North London twaddle. These ejjits think that anything not involving smacking a laptop for a few hours a day is unskilled work that can be picked up in an afternoon.

    Office workers are completely unskilled in trade work. Manufacturing relies on 3-4 year apprenticeships (and sometimes longer than that) to train people in the skills needed.

    Even relatively low-skilled work can take months of training and experience to get up-to-speed with effective use of tooling and quality production.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    What about Deirdre from HR?
    She be good at making Brompton bikes but not much else.

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    What about Deirdre from HR?
    Big glasses?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X