• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Man creates fake traffic jam on Google Maps by carting around 99 cellphones"

Collapse

  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by GJABS View Post
    Maybe their algorithms, machine learning algorithms perhaps, only rarely see 99 people all in the same square foot - so they don't see it as artificial and a candidate for rejection?
    Ah, the old "black swan" .....

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by technobabble View Post
    Does show how big brother Google is watching everything and too deeply involved in our lives.
    It's a bit late to be worrying about that.

    How many people have 'invited' Alexa, Siri, Cortana etc to sit in their house and listen to their conversations?

    All so they can have some music without all the hassle of standing up and turning the radio on.

    You reap what you sow.

    Leave a comment:


  • technobabble
    replied
    Big brother

    Does show how big brother Google is watching everything and too deeply involved in our lives.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    You'd never guess you lot worked in IT.
    Possibly your most insightful post ever. None of us understand art though (but we know what we like)...

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    You'd never guess you lot worked in IT.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    He walked in the middle of the road on the pics.
    Yes, admittedly, an idiot walking around in the middle of the road would cause traffic issues, but that's just because they all have to slow down to his pace so as not to hit him*. It doesn't explain why Google maps was fooled into thinking there was massive congestion when there wasn't, since there were no cars in the pics.

    *I would've tried to hit him, and claimed it was a performance art installation called "The Consequence of Stupidity".

    Leave a comment:


  • GJABS
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    or else they'd also be able to tell that all 99 objects are all occupying pretty much the same square foot of space.
    Maybe their algorithms, machine learning algorithms perhaps, only rarely see 99 people all in the same square foot - so they don't see it as artificial and a candidate for rejection?

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Have I missed something? Why did Google assume it was 99 cars moving at a snails pace, rather than 99 pedestrians moving at normal walking pace? Or did he actually do something a bit naughty and we're not allowed to know what it is?

    I wondered this, their GPS isn't so accurate that they can tell the phones are in the middle of the road rather than their pavement or else they'd also be able to tell that all 99 objects are all occupying pretty much the same square foot of space.

    Maybe all those traffic jams I see on the map are caused by people shuffling along!

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Have I missed something? Why did Google assume it was 99 cars moving at a snails pace, rather than 99 pedestrians moving at normal walking pace? Or did he actually do something a bit naughty and we're not allowed to know what it is?

    He walked in the middle of the road on the pics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Have I missed something? Why did Google assume it was 99 cars moving at a snails pace, rather than 99 pedestrians moving at normal walking pace? Or did he actually do something a bit naughty and we're not allowed to know what it is?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I've rarely found re-routes improve anything, so I'd definitely benefit from this.

    Leave a comment:


  • GJABS
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    Ok funny, but what did he achieve
    A bit of peace and quiet in his neighbourhood. Good for property prices, that

    Leave a comment:


  • PhiltheGreek
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    He’s an artist. Art is what he achieved
    Art? I thought it was a prank. What a tosser. Royal approval is revoked.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    Ok funny, but what did he achieve, cars getting stuck in traffic because they were rerouted and creates congestion on other routes? And who has 99 smartphones just to do a prank?
    He’s an artist. Art is what he achieved

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    At least Extinction Rebellion have found ways of disrupting the traffic while most of them sit at home happy clapping.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X