• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "I had to turn the radio off..."

Collapse

  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    The cockroach was spilling his bile again this morning.

    I went & had a dump to get away from it.

    Now where did I put that bottle of "Raid Ant and Roach killer".

    It's next to the "Cillit Bang!" under the sink. Just in front of the shoe-brush and polishes box.

    Hth.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    Further to this, the obnoxious Gove was on Today this morning.

    I had to turn the wireless off before the urge to terminate him with extreme prejudice became unbearable.
    The cockroach was spilling his bile again this morning.

    I went & had a dump to get away from it.

    Now where did I put that bottle of "Raid Ant and Roach killer".

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    I often turn off the wireless set when some know nothing BBfeckigC mother****er is talking over the top of someone's reply to a question when the answer doesn't fit the BBfeckingC's particular take on something.
    Further to this, the obnoxious Gove was on Today this morning.

    I had to turn the wireless off before the urge to terminate him with extreme prejudice became unbearable.

    It was so bad that I felt sorry for the interviewer.

    Which was a bit of a novel feeling, all in all.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I stopped listening to Radio 4 quite a while ago when it became clear it has turned into Women's Hour 24/7 ?

    Nothing whatever against women, but I find the relentless barrage of feminism and (when they can spare a few moments from women's issues) multiculturalism so tedious.

    Turn it on at random any time in the morning or evening, or probably any other time of day, and you can almost guarantee there will be a woman talking, most likely about other women or Nelson Mandela or some worthy multicultural topic.
    A bit like Radio 2, Nigel Farage always seems to be on Jeremy Vine every time I turn it on, have to switch back to RadioBOB

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by DoctorStrangelove View Post
    I often turn off the wireless set when some know nothing BBfeckigC mother****er is talking over the top of someone's reply to a question when the answer doesn't fit the BBfeckingC's particular take on something.

    I had hoped that PM would improve when the comedian Eddie Mair fecked off, but the replacement twat is even worse.
    I stopped listening to Radio 4 quite a while ago when it became clear it has turned into Women's Hour 24/7 ?

    Nothing whatever against women, but I find the relentless barrage of feminism and (when they can spare a few moments from women's issues) multiculturalism so tedious.

    Turn it on at random any time in the morning or evening, or probably any other time of day, and you can almost guarantee there will be a woman talking, most likely about other women or Nelson Mandela or some worthy multicultural topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    Say what you want about Eddie, but the funniest moment on PM was him interviewing the Circus clown taking his employer to a tribunal as he was made redundant when he switched to being a human cannonball

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    I often turn off the wireless set when some know nothing BBfeckigC mother****er is talking over the top of someone's reply to a question when the answer doesn't fit the BBfeckingC's particular take on something.

    I had hoped that PM would improve when the comedian Eddie Mair fecked off, but the replacement twat is even worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Every UK event in the last 40 years that has resulted in the deaths of more than 10 people, blame has been attributed to the Conservatives. Whether they are in office or not.
    A labour government was in power at the time of the Aberfan disaster and despite a damning report from the enquiry, no one was charged with any offence. Robens even ended his days as the head of some health and safety organisation. To rub salt in the wound, the Labour government charged the disaster fund for removing the remaining tips, which were still predominant in the skyline for years after the disaster. Then when Tony Bliar's government announced that they would repay the actual amount taken from the disaster fund, less interest by the way, and not the adjusted value, he was praised for doing so. When will we all understand that the establishment protects its own in all these issues, just as it has done for Grenfell. This situation will not change even if good fortune deserted us and Korbyn ever did reach no. 10
    Last edited by JohntheBike; 1 November 2019, 12:27.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohntheBike
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    I think it's disgusting that the report was leaked to the press a day or two before it's official release. Gives no opportunity for the people actually affected by the fire to read and respond. Instead all manner of people were being asked to comment on something that they'd heard of third hand.
    establishment protecting its own again

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    Thankfully people in position to make decisions don't agree with you!!!

    Looking at the images (even just minutes from the ignition) of the tower burning you don't need to be an expert to understand that something was seriously wrong and the fire (or isolation) wasn't behaving as it should...

    You know in a disaster one tends to follow the procedures & plan to avoid making bigger mistakes.This applies in the military, emergency services & even in IT.

    The key point I was making was the plan was wrong and no one changed it despite a series of incidents that should have revised it.


    Grenfell Tower fire - Wikipedia


    Cladding in London high-rise fire also blamed for 2014 Melbourne blaze | UK news | The Guardian

    You seem to think the fire fighters should have gone all yipee ki yay and think that is a valid response.
    Blimey even warty is brighter than that. Even with the benefit of hindsight you are talking out of your arse!

    it has now become a scapegoat hunt and nothing will be done about the core problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • CryingSheep
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    You have seen what the Government have done to ex Army soldiers in Northern Ireland? If there were any casualties at all the lawyers would have been all over them. They were just following the chain of command.

    Agreeing with warty seems wrong but a stopped clock & all that. The official policy used for decades was 'stay put' just as the Army was trained to fix bayonets and walk slowly across no man's land. Do tell me how long it took the generals to figure that one out?

    Cause of Grenfell in my opinion, order of prevent-ability I am of course no means an expert but it seems there were lots of opportunities missed here.

    1. Failure of the building regulations to clearly ban a material that had been shown to change the nature of high rise fires for the worse and that was banned in other countries.

    2. The government removing the fire brigade's responsibility for granting fire safety certs.

    3. A white goods manufacturer cutting costs and releasing dangerous goods subject to recall. Though there are multiple possible ignition causes this one is just a peach.

    4. The fire safety precautions that weren't implemented or were bypassed by the quango owners.

    5. Failure to mandate fitting sprinklers, fire door monitors & smoke extractors in high rise communal ares. This would probably permit safe evacuation later in the fire and change the official guidance.

    200. Failure of owners / builders to identify the material as unsuitable.
    201. Failure of the Fire service experts to notice that the dangerous cladding had changed the behaviour of a number of tower fires which would mean a change in official tactics.

    300000. The chiefs on the night realising in the heat of the fire that the fire was behaving differently so they should challenge the official policy.
    300001 failure of the tenant to notice someone had sold him a dangerous appliance
    .
    999999999999999999999999999 any of the fire fighters saving the day Bruce Willis stylee. Shall we call it the shagged sheep option?

    Thankfully people in position to make decisions don't agree with you!!!

    Looking at the images (even just minutes from the ignition) of the tower burning you don't need to be an expert to understand that something was seriously wrong and the fire (or isolation) wasn't behaving as it should...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by ShaggedSheep View Post
    And thinking that is more important to cover your ass from being sued than doing what feels that could save more lives was probably what went wrong there!

    *sorry, one of the things that went wrong there
    You have seen what the Government have done to ex Army soldiers in Northern Ireland? If there were any casualties at all the lawyers would have been all over them. They were just following the chain of command.

    Agreeing with warty seems wrong but a stopped clock & all that. The official policy used for decades was 'stay put' just as the Army was trained to fix bayonets and walk slowly across no man's land. Do tell me how long it took the generals to figure that one out?

    Cause of Grenfell in my opinion, order of prevent-ability I am of course no means an expert but it seems there were lots of opportunities missed here.

    1. Failure of the building regulations to clearly ban a material that had been shown to change the nature of high rise fires for the worse and that was banned in other countries.

    2. The government removing the fire brigade's responsibility for granting fire safety certs.

    3. A white goods manufacturer cutting costs and releasing dangerous goods subject to recall. Though there are multiple possible ignition causes this one is just a peach.

    4. The fire safety precautions that weren't implemented or were bypassed by the quango owners.

    5. Failure to mandate fitting sprinklers, fire door monitors & smoke extractors in high rise communal ares. This would probably permit safe evacuation later in the fire and change the official guidance.

    200. Failure of owners / builders to identify the material as unsuitable.
    201. Failure of the Fire service experts to notice that the dangerous cladding had changed the behaviour of a number of tower fires which would mean a change in official tactics.

    300000. The chiefs on the night realising in the heat of the fire that the fire was behaving differently so they should challenge the official policy.
    300001 failure of the tenant to notice someone had sold him a dangerous appliance
    .
    999999999999999999999999999 any of the fire fighters saving the day Bruce Willis stylee. Shall we call it the shagged sheep option?

    Leave a comment:


  • CryingSheep
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    That may be so in principle, but if the firemen had deviated from the "stay put" rule then any survivors and relatives of victims etc could sue for damages.
    And thinking that is more important to cover your ass from being sued than doing what feels that could save more lives was probably what went wrong there!

    *sorry, one of the things that went wrong there

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Stands to reason dunnit? I mean it's all Fatcher's fault!
    According Gospel of Ben Elton, yep.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X