Originally posted by minestrone
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I had to turn the radio off...
Collapse
X
-
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here -
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostStands to reason dunnit? I mean it's all Fatcher's fault!Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostThat may be so in principle, but if the firemen had deviated from the "stay put" rule then any survivors and relatives of victims etc could sue for damages.
*sorry, one of the things that went wrong there"The boy who cried Sheep"Comment
-
Originally posted by ShaggedSheep View PostAnd thinking that is more important to cover your ass from being sued than doing what feels that could save more lives was probably what went wrong there!
*sorry, one of the things that went wrong there
Agreeing with warty seems wrong but a stopped clock & all that. The official policy used for decades was 'stay put' just as the Army was trained to fix bayonets and walk slowly across no man's land. Do tell me how long it took the generals to figure that one out?
Cause of Grenfell in my opinion, order of prevent-ability I am of course no means an expert but it seems there were lots of opportunities missed here.
1. Failure of the building regulations to clearly ban a material that had been shown to change the nature of high rise fires for the worse and that was banned in other countries.
2. The government removing the fire brigade's responsibility for granting fire safety certs.
3. A white goods manufacturer cutting costs and releasing dangerous goods subject to recall. Though there are multiple possible ignition causes this one is just a peach.
4. The fire safety precautions that weren't implemented or were bypassed by the quango owners.
5. Failure to mandate fitting sprinklers, fire door monitors & smoke extractors in high rise communal ares. This would probably permit safe evacuation later in the fire and change the official guidance.
200. Failure of owners / builders to identify the material as unsuitable.
201. Failure of the Fire service experts to notice that the dangerous cladding had changed the behaviour of a number of tower fires which would mean a change in official tactics.
300000. The chiefs on the night realising in the heat of the fire that the fire was behaving differently so they should challenge the official policy.
300001 failure of the tenant to notice someone had sold him a dangerous appliance
.
999999999999999999999999999 any of the fire fighters saving the day Bruce Willis stylee. Shall we call it the shagged sheep option?Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostYou have seen what the Government have done to ex Army soldiers in Northern Ireland? If there were any casualties at all the lawyers would have been all over them. They were just following the chain of command.
Agreeing with warty seems wrong but a stopped clock & all that. The official policy used for decades was 'stay put' just as the Army was trained to fix bayonets and walk slowly across no man's land. Do tell me how long it took the generals to figure that one out?
Cause of Grenfell in my opinion, order of prevent-ability I am of course no means an expert but it seems there were lots of opportunities missed here.
1. Failure of the building regulations to clearly ban a material that had been shown to change the nature of high rise fires for the worse and that was banned in other countries.
2. The government removing the fire brigade's responsibility for granting fire safety certs.
3. A white goods manufacturer cutting costs and releasing dangerous goods subject to recall. Though there are multiple possible ignition causes this one is just a peach.
4. The fire safety precautions that weren't implemented or were bypassed by the quango owners.
5. Failure to mandate fitting sprinklers, fire door monitors & smoke extractors in high rise communal ares. This would probably permit safe evacuation later in the fire and change the official guidance.
200. Failure of owners / builders to identify the material as unsuitable.
201. Failure of the Fire service experts to notice that the dangerous cladding had changed the behaviour of a number of tower fires which would mean a change in official tactics.
300000. The chiefs on the night realising in the heat of the fire that the fire was behaving differently so they should challenge the official policy.
300001 failure of the tenant to notice someone had sold him a dangerous appliance
.
999999999999999999999999999 any of the fire fighters saving the day Bruce Willis stylee. Shall we call it the shagged sheep option?
Thankfully people in position to make decisions don't agree with you!!!
Looking at the images (even just minutes from the ignition) of the tower burning you don't need to be an expert to understand that something was seriously wrong and the fire (or isolation) wasn't behaving as it should..."The boy who cried Sheep"Comment
-
Originally posted by CryingSheep View PostThankfully people in position to make decisions don't agree with you!!!
Looking at the images (even just minutes from the ignition) of the tower burning you don't need to be an expert to understand that something was seriously wrong and the fire (or isolation) wasn't behaving as it should...
You know in a disaster one tends to follow the procedures & plan to avoid making bigger mistakes.This applies in the military, emergency services & even in IT.
The key point I was making was the plan was wrong and no one changed it despite a series of incidents that should have revised it.
Grenfell Tower fire - Wikipedia
Cladding in London high-rise fire also blamed for 2014 Melbourne blaze | UK news | The Guardian
You seem to think the fire fighters should have gone all yipee ki yay and think that is a valid response.
Blimey even warty is brighter than that. Even with the benefit of hindsight you are talking out of your arse!
it has now become a scapegoat hunt and nothing will be done about the core problem.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostI think it's disgusting that the report was leaked to the press a day or two before it's official release. Gives no opportunity for the people actually affected by the fire to read and respond. Instead all manner of people were being asked to comment on something that they'd heard of third hand.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostEvery UK event in the last 40 years that has resulted in the deaths of more than 10 people, blame has been attributed to the Conservatives. Whether they are in office or not.Last edited by JohntheBike; 1 November 2019, 12:27.Comment
-
I often turn off the wireless set when some know nothing BBfeckigC mother****er is talking over the top of someone's reply to a question when the answer doesn't fit the BBfeckingC's particular take on something.
I had hoped that PM would improve when the comedian Eddie Mair fecked off, but the replacement twat is even worse.When the fun stops, STOP.Comment
-
Say what you want about Eddie, but the funniest moment on PM was him interviewing the Circus clown taking his employer to a tribunal as he was made redundant when he switched to being a human cannonballComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Today 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment