• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Oh dear never mind

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh dear never mind"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Yes, but in this case, less is wrong.

    Sent from my G8141 using Contractor UK Forum mobile app

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Get it right.


    You never heard of "less is more?"

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    The amount of payment is immaterial, as is the preception of value obtained.

    The principle of forcing workers into a self-employed or LtdCo structure to avoid liabilities as an employer is something that HMG / HMRC has refused to tackle to date. Their focus has always been to assume that the worker is a tax dodging shyster and that the hiring organisation is cleaner than a squeaky clean thing.

    It annoys me immensely that IR35 points the finger at the wrong entity.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Oh dear never mind
    Get it right.

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    By twats, I meant greatly overpaid twats. How are these salaries justified?
    Quite.

    I was immensely grateful when someone paid that twat Eddie Mair on the PM programme to go somewhere else.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    By twats, I meant greatly overpaid twats. How are these salaries justified?

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Does it matter? BBC is funded by licence fees, we end up paying for these twats anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Oh dear never mind

    Oh dear never mind

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...MRC-probe.html

    BBC chief admits 3,000 radio staff could be hit by massive tax bills after being caught in HMRC probeNumber was revealed by director general Lord Hall while giving evidence to MPs
    BBC workers were urged to set up personal service companies so they could be treated as freelancers and save BBC millions in National Insurance contributions
    Thought lots of the people affected are in local radio and not on high incomes

    Maybe they will find a way to spank the BBC as well.

Working...
X