• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "May Has Really Screwed Up..."

Collapse

  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Do you think that when Labour were in government and the UKBF made the decision, it was with the intention of deporting people? I suspect not. Was it a major issue that should have been considered at the time? Probably not.
    When the decision was made to deport, was the question asked about the people whose landing cards had been destroyed? I suspect not. Should that have been a major issue at the time? Yes.
    Who made the decision to deport? That's the question that should be asked, rather than the usual twisting/deflecting of arguments that happens here a lot.
    I totally agree. My point was about the cynical way May tried to deflect whilst she was channelling Thatcher in PMQs.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by radish2008 View Post
    Ok let me spell it out for you.

    1. 2009 the border force takes a decision to destroy the landing card. Import bit here is Labour is in power.
    2. 2010/2011/whenever the landing cards are destroyed.

    TM was very careful to say UNDER a Labour government, specifically not BY a Labour government.
    She knew exactly what had happened and wanted to get it into the public domain that Labour was at fault here, not her or the Tories.

    Do you think that when the landing cards were destroyed nobody at all said 'do we still want to do this ?'
    Do you think that when Labour were in government and the UKBF made the decision, it was with the intention of deporting people? I suspect not. Was it a major issue that should have been considered at the time? Probably not.
    When the decision was made to deport, was the question asked about the people whose landing cards had been destroyed? I suspect not. Should that have been a major issue at the time? Yes.
    Who made the decision to deport? That's the question that should be asked, rather than the usual twisting/deflecting of arguments that happens here a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    No, you don't get it.

    If it was under a Lab government, then they could/should have known - they just didn't bother to fact-check before trying to use it as a political football.
    Ok let me spell it out for you.

    1. 2009 the border force takes a decision to destroy the landing card. Import bit here is Labour is in power.
    2. 2010/2011/whenever the landing cards are destroyed.

    TM was very careful to say UNDER a Labour government, specifically not BY a Labour government.
    She knew exactly what had happened and wanted to get it into the public domain that Labour was at fault here, not her or the Tories.

    Do you think that when the landing cards were destroyed nobody at all said 'do we still want to do this ?'

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by radish2008 View Post
    You don't get it do you. May knew the night before exactly what had happened. She then made the statement, knowing it would be reported, and then retracted it 30 minutes later. All of this whilst crying crocodile tears that she was sorry.

    Theresa May in action
    No, you don't get it.

    If it was under a Lab government, then they could/should have known - they just didn't bother to fact-check before trying to use it as a political football.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    You are a bloody racist preventing nurses coming over here to keep wages down and deprive LEDC's of talent rather than us hiring locally. Jeez I have been banging on about this for years!
    And there was I thinking it was the 52%

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    You couldn't make it up, mind you, they'll be sent back after 3 years, possibly:

    https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/wo...024177.article

    Jamaica keeps losing its best nurses to the UK | The Voice Online
    You are a bloody racist preventing nurses coming over here to keep wages down and deprive LEDC's of talent rather than us hiring locally. Jeez I have been banging on about this for years!

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    You couldn't make it up, mind you, they'll be sent back after 3 years, possibly:

    https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/wo...024177.article

    Jamaica keeps losing its best nurses to the UK | The Voice Online

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    ftfy
    You don't get it do you. May knew the night before exactly what had happened. She then made the statement, knowing it would be reported, and then retracted it 30 minutes later. All of this whilst crying crocodile tears that she was sorry.

    Theresa May in action

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by radish2008 View Post
    Yes. A very careful use of the word under.

    The fact is it was ACTIONED under a Tory Gov, BY the Home Office and it is totally ******* lame for this tulip government to constantly blame Labour for it's own mistakes, of which there are many and vice-versa.
    ftfy

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by Bean View Post
    Just to add, the exact wording is important, as it changes the meaning of the accusation made by TM:

    "No, the decision to destroy the landing cards was taken in 2009 under a Labour Government."
    https://hansard.parliament.uk/Common...ersToQuestions
    Yes. A very careful use of the word under.

    The fact is it was ACTIONED under a Tory Gov and it is totally ******* lame for this tulip government to constantly blame Labour for it's own mistakes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bean
    replied
    Originally posted by radish2008 View Post
    I guess we know now the reason he didn't know was because it wasn't true.

    Home Office Tues, 5pm: Decision to dispose of Windrush 'registration slips' was taken by UK Border Agency in 2010.
    PM tells MPs, Weds 1210pm: Decision was taken by Labour in 2009.
    PM's spokesperson, Weds, 1240pm: "Operational decision was by UKBA"ie not by Lab ministers.
    Just to add, the exact wording is important, as it changes the meaning of the accusation made by TM:

    "No, the decision to destroy the landing cards was taken in 2009 under a Labour Government."
    https://hansard.parliament.uk/Common...ersToQuestions

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Not a fan of her politics but I bet Dianne Abbot has a much nicer (ie bigger) bum.

    PS Sexist remark. I do so wholly regret etc etc.
    yes but its attached to Diane Abbott!

    Have some standards lust after Kim Kardashian instead.

    Leave a comment:


  • BR14
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Not a fan of her politics but I bet Dianne Abbot has a much nicer (ie bigger) bum.

    PS Sexist remark. I do so wholly regret etc etc.



    there you go

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    The thought of Theresa May topless is enough to kill without any polonium
    Not a fan of her politics but I bet Dianne Abbot has a much nicer (ie bigger) bum.

    PS Sexist remark. I do so wholly regret etc etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jog On
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    You see? One look at Vlad and you've forgotten all about Theresa!
    If only I could forget about Theresa...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X