Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: May Has Really Screwed Up...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "May Has Really Screwed Up..."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostOk let me spell it out for you.
1. 2009 the border force takes a decision to destroy the landing card. Import bit here is Labour is in power.
2. 2010/2011/whenever the landing cards are destroyed.
TM was very careful to say UNDER a Labour government, specifically not BY a Labour government.
She knew exactly what had happened and wanted to get it into the public domain that Labour was at fault here, not her or the Tories.
Do you think that when the landing cards were destroyed nobody at all said 'do we still want to do this ?'
When the decision was made to deport, was the question asked about the people whose landing cards had been destroyed? I suspect not. Should that have been a major issue at the time? Yes.
Who made the decision to deport? That's the question that should be asked, rather than the usual twisting/deflecting of arguments that happens here a lot.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostNo, you don't get it.
If it was under a Lab government, then they could/should have known - they just didn't bother to fact-check before trying to use it as a political football.
1. 2009 the border force takes a decision to destroy the landing card. Import bit here is Labour is in power.
2. 2010/2011/whenever the landing cards are destroyed.
TM was very careful to say UNDER a Labour government, specifically not BY a Labour government.
She knew exactly what had happened and wanted to get it into the public domain that Labour was at fault here, not her or the Tories.
Do you think that when the landing cards were destroyed nobody at all said 'do we still want to do this ?'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostYou don't get it do you. May knew the night before exactly what had happened. She then made the statement, knowing it would be reported, and then retracted it 30 minutes later. All of this whilst crying crocodile tears that she was sorry.
Theresa May in action
If it was under a Lab government, then they could/should have known - they just didn't bother to fact-check before trying to use it as a political football.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostYou are a bloody racist preventing nurses coming over here to keep wages down and deprive LEDC's of talent rather than us hiring locally. Jeez I have been banging on about this for years!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostYou couldn't make it up, mind you, they'll be sent back after 3 years, possibly:
https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/wo...024177.article
Jamaica keeps losing its best nurses to the UK | The Voice Online
Leave a comment:
-
You couldn't make it up, mind you, they'll be sent back after 3 years, possibly:
https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/wo...024177.article
Jamaica keeps losing its best nurses to the UK | The Voice Online
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View Postftfy
Theresa May in action
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostYes. A very careful use of the word under.
The fact is it was ACTIONED under a Tory Gov, BY the Home Office and it is totally ******* lame for this tulip government to constantly blame Labour for it's own mistakes, of which there are many and vice-versa.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bean View PostJust to add, the exact wording is important, as it changes the meaning of the accusation made by TM:
"No, the decision to destroy the landing cards was taken in 2009 under a Labour Government."
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Common...ersToQuestions
The fact is it was ACTIONED under a Tory Gov and it is totally ******* lame for this tulip government to constantly blame Labour for it's own mistakes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by radish2008 View PostI guess we know now the reason he didn't know was because it wasn't true.
Home Office Tues, 5pm: Decision to dispose of Windrush 'registration slips' was taken by UK Border Agency in 2010.
PM tells MPs, Weds 1210pm: Decision was taken by Labour in 2009.
PM's spokesperson, Weds, 1240pm: "Operational decision was by UKBA"ie not by Lab ministers.
"No, the decision to destroy the landing cards was taken in 2009 under a Labour Government."
https://hansard.parliament.uk/Common...ersToQuestions
Leave a comment:
-
The thought of Theresa May topless is enough to kill without any polonium
PS Sexist remark. I do so wholly regret etc etc.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: