Originally posted by diseasex
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Positive news on immigration
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Positive news on immigration"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View PostI've always wondered why the UK never implemented European Directive 2004/38 which basically states that since 2004, it has allowed governments to control movements of EU citizens as follows: allow EU citizens to freely circulate only for three months and then require them (should they want to stay longer) to show they are working (employed or self-employed), a registered student or have sufficient resources to support them self and comprehensive sickness insurance.
also you could curb immigration in half just by banning people from outside of europe. Just like that, without upsetting 27 neighbours
Leave a comment:
-
I've always wondered why the UK never implemented European Directive 2004/38 which basically states that since 2004, it has allowed governments to control movements of EU citizens as follows: allow EU citizens to freely circulate only for three months and then require them (should they want to stay longer) to show they are working (employed or self-employed), a registered student or have sufficient resources to support them self and comprehensive sickness insurance.
Article 7
Right of residence for more than three months. All Union citizens shall have the right of residence on the territory of another Member State fora period of longer than three months if they:
(a) are workers or self-employed persons in the host Member State; or
(b) have sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden onthe social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence and have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State; or
(c) – are enrolled at a private or public establishment, accredited or financed by the host Member State on the basis of its legislation or administrative practice, for the principal purpose of following a course of study, including vocational training; and– have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State and assure the relevant national authority, by means of a declaration or by such equivalent means as they may choose, that they have sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden on the social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence.
Leave a comment:
-
Using the Trump playbook... make the nation such an undesirable, unfriendly place for foreigners they don't want to come here. (This genuinely happened with Mexican immigration)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostYes because importing nurses from countries with a greater need than us is of course perfectly acceptable. Hmm its been a sticking plaster for dreadful government policy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Spartan View PostYeah I know what you're saying my Dad's side of the family are Filippino and they're all over the world.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostIt's something of an economic and social model. The Philippines train and export nurses who send back remittances. The kids stay with the grandparents. It's quite sad, really, but there you go.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Spartan View PostThat's because it's very difficult for Filippinos to get in the UK as it is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostPhilippines is a major exporter of nurses. The families tend to stay at home.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostI very much suspect they'll compensate by recruiting nurses from Asian and Middle Eastern countries and provide accommodation for them and their families.
Leave a comment:
-
I very much suspect they'll compensate by recruiting nurses from Asian and Middle Eastern countries and provide accommodation for them and their families.
Leave a comment:
-
Unless you're in IT and then the figures are non-EU which makes a mockery of Leavers: Record number of non-EU techies coming to Blighty • The Register
Leave a comment:
-
She added: ‘Clearly action is needed to offset any further loss of EU nursing staff in the near future. But the overall shortage of 30,000 nurses is not a shortage caused by the Brexit vote.
'The chronic shortage of nurses is the result of years of short-term planning and cuts to training places. A sustainable, long-term approach to workforce planning is desperately needed.'
Hmm its been a sticking plaster for dreadful government policy.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: