• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Positive news on immigration"

Collapse

  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    +1
    also you could curb immigration in half just by banning people from outside of europe. Just like that, without upsetting 27 neighbours
    But to do that would require the government to do something, when it's a lot easier just to blame others.

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    I've always wondered why the UK never implemented European Directive 2004/38 which basically states that since 2004, it has allowed governments to control movements of EU citizens as follows: allow EU citizens to freely circulate only for three months and then require them (should they want to stay longer) to show they are working (employed or self-employed), a registered student or have sufficient resources to support them self and comprehensive sickness insurance.
    +1
    also you could curb immigration in half just by banning people from outside of europe. Just like that, without upsetting 27 neighbours

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    I've always wondered why the UK never implemented European Directive 2004/38 which basically states that since 2004, it has allowed governments to control movements of EU citizens as follows: allow EU citizens to freely circulate only for three months and then require them (should they want to stay longer) to show they are working (employed or self-employed), a registered student or have sufficient resources to support them self and comprehensive sickness insurance.

    Article 7

    Right of residence for more than three months. All Union citizens shall have the right of residence on the territory of another Member State fora period of longer than three months if they:
    (a) are workers or self-employed persons in the host Member State; or
    (b) have sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden onthe social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence and have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State; or
    (c) – are enrolled at a private or public establishment, accredited or financed by the host Member State on the basis of its legislation or administrative practice, for the principal purpose of following a course of study, including vocational training; and– have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State and assure the relevant national authority, by means of a declaration or by such equivalent means as they may choose, that they have sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden on the social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Using the Trump playbook... make the nation such an undesirable, unfriendly place for foreigners they don't want to come here. (This genuinely happened with Mexican immigration)

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    I very much suspect they'll compensate by recruiting nurses from Asian and Middle Eastern countries and provide accommodation for them and their families.
    Yes, but they won't be called immigrants in stats - just nurses.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Yes because importing nurses from countries with a greater need than us is of course perfectly acceptable. Hmm its been a sticking plaster for dreadful government policy.
    It is totally acceptable since those countries don't offer their own nurses good enough conditions to stay - won't take long until UK nurses start leaving soon

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
    Yeah I know what you're saying my Dad's side of the family are Filippino and they're all over the world.
    Filippino nurses tend to be highly regarded in the NHS for their work ethic.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    It's something of an economic and social model. The Philippines train and export nurses who send back remittances. The kids stay with the grandparents. It's quite sad, really, but there you go.
    Yeah I know what you're saying my Dad's side of the family are Filippino and they're all over the world.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by The Spartan View Post
    That's because it's very difficult for Filippinos to get in the UK as it is.
    It's something of an economic and social model. The Philippines train and export nurses who send back remittances. The kids stay with the grandparents. It's quite sad, really, but there you go.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Spartan
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
    Philippines is a major exporter of nurses. The families tend to stay at home.
    That's because it's very difficult for Filippinos to get in the UK as it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    I very much suspect they'll compensate by recruiting nurses from Asian and Middle Eastern countries and provide accommodation for them and their families.
    Philippines is a major exporter of nurses. The families tend to stay at home.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    I very much suspect they'll compensate by recruiting nurses from Asian and Middle Eastern countries and provide accommodation for them and their families.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Unless you're in IT and then the figures are non-EU which makes a mockery of Leavers: Record number of non-EU techies coming to Blighty • The Register

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    She added: ‘Clearly action is needed to offset any further loss of EU nursing staff in the near future. But the overall shortage of 30,000 nurses is not a shortage caused by the Brexit vote.

    'The chronic shortage of nurses is the result of years of short-term planning and cuts to training places. A sustainable, long-term approach to workforce planning is desperately needed.'
    Yes because importing nurses from countries with a greater need than us is of course perfectly acceptable.

    Hmm its been a sticking plaster for dreadful government policy.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladyuk
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Well, we soon saw them off, didn't we sir? Miserable slant-eye, sausage eating swine.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X