• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Has wearable tech had its day?"

Collapse

  • RSoles
    replied
    And then I noticed this today:-
    STI-detecting smart condom brings new meaning to 'wearable tech' - BelfastTelegraph.co.uk

    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by RonBW View Post
    The WeVibe is much better - long distance remote control via the app
    The other devices earn a well-deserved break too....

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    Perhaps we won't have them on our wrists but will be on/in our body.
    Yes I agree.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by RonBW View Post
    The WeVibe is much better - long distance remote control via the app
    Most of the other posters were probably wondering what on earth it was

    Leave a comment:


  • RonBW
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    No.

    Seems alive and well for certain applications
    The WeVibe is much better - long distance remote control via the app

    Leave a comment:


  • vwdan
    replied
    Too big brother for me - considered signing up to Vitality Health as some of the benefits are nice, but I'm ****ed I'm going to be wearing a fitbit all the time.

    Plus there was that study recently that said people wearing these things actually lose less weight - I know exactly why, it's the same reason I don't lose much weight with running. "Oh, hey - I've burnt 2000 calories. Hello KFC Family Bucket".

    And realistically - what else they can monitor? We've got steps which is meh, GPS tracking is GPS tracking and I'd prefer a high quality Garmin for that. Then I guess we can do heart rate and sats - big whoop. Then what?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Has wearable tech had its day?
    No.

    Seems alive and well for certain applications


    Leave a comment:


  • greenlake
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    I wear a Casio digital watch. I love it. Tells me the time; the date. Can use it as an alarm. Everything you want from wearable tech.
    And porn....!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    In one of the offices at clientco, all the smokers seem to be on the first floor. They all use the lifts when they go outside to smoke.
    Reminds of the time I worked on the 11th floor of an office building. The lifts would randomly break in the morning and you could tell who did and didn't smoke.

    The smokers all sounded like they were going to collapse immediately once they got up the stairs.


    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Yep. Going to someone's desk instead of emailing/calling.
    True It's actually more effective in getting things done.


    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Using the stairs.
    True - It's actually faster if you are reasonably fit. Though you can't do it with a cup of coffee.

    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Parking a little further away than the closest car park
    True - plus you are less likely to get your car pranged.

    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    (or getting off the tube a stop earlier and walking).
    Not always a good idea if the stop before is an very busy one and the further out of London you are the tube stops tend to be a 2-5 miles apart rather than 1.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Other than fitness gadgets, which are becoming mainstream (half my friends seem to have them and they talk about it ad nauseam) it doesn't seem to have caught on. For the reason that they are never quite as slick as they need to be. They need to just work, flawlessly... you don't want to have to be dicking about resyncing your trousers or whatever.

    When they can properly integrate tech with glasses so you don't look like a twit I can see that being a big deal now machine learning is getting so creepily good.

    I imagine smart medical implants might be a thing but that's far more specialist. I wonder if non-medical implants (not boobs) will ever take off?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Indeed. I don't understand some people who drive small distances, stand around on escalators, take lifts instead of using the stairs etc.
    In one of the offices at clientco, all the smokers seem to be on the first floor. They all use the lifts when they go outside to smoke.

    You can probably improve health significantly during a normal day's movement without going to a gym.
    Yep. Going to someone's desk instead of emailing/calling. Using the stairs. Parking a little further away than the closest car park (or getting off the tube a stop earlier and walking).

    Leave a comment:


  • anonymouse
    replied
    Watch and/or health monitor, depending on what is needed

    New diabetes device could end finger pricking for blood testing

    "The device can continuously monitor blood glucose levels, which means development as a wearable device might not be far away."

    "This wearable device would then be just one step from a product which sends alerts to smart phones or readings directly to doctors, allowing them to profile how a person is managing their diabetes over time." I'd rather wear a connected wrist device, rather than using a phone in this case.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    While I'm trying to lose weight it's really helpful to see how a small walk into town rather than get a bus can burn 200+ calories etc
    Indeed. I don't understand some people who drive small distances, stand around on escalators, take lifts instead of using the stairs etc. You can probably improve health significantly during a normal day's movement without going to a gym.

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    On a global scale the wearable tech is still a niche product, but i believe it's here to stay. Health/fitness monitoring will improve and all the major players are turning their eyes on augmented reality, sooner rather than later the failed google glass type of tech will emerge. At first in specialist areas and work environments that can benefit from it, then eventually to the masses.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    I have a Pebble Steel. Needs charging every ten days - takes about 20 minutes. It's smaller than my previous watch. I got it mainly for the ability to choose my own watch faces, but appreciate the step and sleep monitors. I find the notifications function (of the arrival of text messages, emails etc.) to be very convenient. It also buzzes if it loses bluetooth connection, which proved very useful when I left my phone in a restaurant.

    It's a shame they folded. There were neat plans, like having the battery in the watch strap, thus making the form of the actual watch even smaller, without compromising charge length.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X