Originally posted by henryhooverville
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Rich/Tight contractors?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Rich/Tight contractors?"
Collapse
-
I am not a contracter per se but...
My understanding of the tax system, from years of Money Box on radio, is that dividends can be really flexible in terms of when they arrive (monthly, bi/tri, 6 or 12 months etc.) however the tax implications can change.
For example a monthly dividend could be treated as a standard income when being assessed, quarterly is an option if you prefer near-constant payments and is more business like but still a compromise. Yearly dividends are the most popular and you'll find that it's used on most type B shares.
Now things get interesting if you are a listed company, in that the business can 'own' its own shares and not have to pay a dividend to itself (that would be odd) but to shareholders yes. I think small enterprises can claim EIS tax relief so investors don't have to pay income tax on those dividends.
That's all I really know, it depends on how you want your self-assessments to look if other people glance at it. I'd wager every six months is a fair compromise and it looks like standard dues to an investor than say a monthly dividend would.
I'm not a tax man, I am in fact what you'd define a kid (19 years old), and a taxman/accountant is best suited to look at your particular needs as a business/household. Hope this helps (?)
Leave a comment:
-
One divi on the 6th April then wait a whole 12 months. Rest goes into pension and business saving accounts.
I live on a £7k salary and travel expenses.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pr1 View Postand likewise the third world should start feeling ashamed?
But in the LEDCs (they don't like being called the Third world apparently) maybe we could shame the leaders & dictators who are mostly to blame for the last 50+ years instead of following the 'its the Imperialist west's fault' mantra.
India is doing well, Pakistan isn't. Hong Kong is doing well, Africa isn't. explain why.
Clearly something other than once being part of the Empire is causing these difficulties.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by VectraMan View PostThe traditional way was for companies to pay a dividend once a year, and a lot of companies still do that. Paying yourself less than you need to live on and topping it up with regular dividends is more of a tax avoider thing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostLoose and Poor?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by barrydidit View PostTight and Rich are the opposite of the two adjectives I would use to describe your old man, but there you go.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostThe old man blackmails members of the judiciary on a similar schedule.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostSome of the share holdings I have pay 2 interim and one final. Bloody annoying as you have to work out why you suddenly have some money.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by amanwhoisquiet View PostI've seen this mentioned in a post today and I don't want to hijack the thread to ask this question but how does someone make this work? I've seen it mentioned on the site before with regard to pensions (putting all ir35 contract earnings into a pension for example). I get that some of the guys on here have been doing it for years and might have a substantial pers acct warchest, but what's even the point of this? Isn't it just good sense to draw divis up to the top of the basic rates?
What am I missing?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostI guess the key is in the word "yet"?
I haven't yet taken dividends this last Co year, as I'm still "living" on divs paid to the max amount last Co year.
Although in an ideal world you take your annual dividend out at the START of the tax year not the end because you have enough in the company account... then you can max out your ISA on day 1 and maximise the potential. I've not reached the point of being able to do that thus far though.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Today 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Leave a comment: