• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "We grab the moon because it is hard"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    We grab the moon because it is hard
    Trump thinks "moon" is a synonym for "pussy".

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Maybe his plan is to provide space hotels on the moon for all the mega rich, eventually leading to a colony for the privileged.

    The money from fleecing all those billionaires would pay towards further uses such as building a base to explore space without all the energy cost of escaping the Earth's gravity each time.

    To start all they need is a decent 3d printer. If you can build sand castles on a beach it must be easy to build similar out of moon dust. Maybe the elemental composition of the moon would allow manufacturing of more permanent structures and facilities.

    The cost needs a global effort for mankind to finally start looking at serious plans for colonising off Earth.

    Or maybe he just wants to see Pink Floyd play live from the dark side of the moon.

    Leave a comment:


  • SeededLoaf
    replied
    Shortly after that announcement, the CIA are forced to secretly admit to Trump that the landing was faked.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    All that money wasted could be spent deporting immigrants and building a 300 foot thick concrete dome over the whole USA.

    Leave a comment:


  • tomtomagain
    replied
    Originally posted by Moose423956 View Post
    I heard it's going to be the location for the new Trump University, so he can't be sued when it goes tits up.

    I heard that it's because housing there is affordable and it's only a 3 million mile trip to Canary Wharf.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moose423956
    replied
    I heard it's going to be the location for the new Trump University, so he can't be sued when it goes tits up.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    You can see where this is going can't you. There is going to be some "Trump" real estate on there.

    I think it is an excellent move as it will divert everyone's attention whilst he backtracks on all his other promises.

    Leave a comment:


  • meridian
    replied
    We grab the moon because it is hard

    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Everything you want to launch from the moon you have to transport to the moon first since mining prospects are minimal. So you still have to get everything to the moon from Earth which is the step we want to avoid... we have to launch stuff from Earth, land it on the moon, assemble it and launch it from the moon.

    Or you can launch it from Earth ready-built on top of a large re-usable rocket like SpaceX are working on and cut the moon out of the equation entirely.
    That's true. However, a large reusable rocket launched from Earth needs to consist of mostly fuel. Building a depot on the moon would provide at least two benefits:
    - we can practise building facilities in a place where, if something goes wrong, it's only a couple of days/weeks until help arrives, instead of months
    - when we do make the leap to Mars, the ship can carry more useful things (food, water, equipment) due to the reduced payload of fuel.

    The reusable Space-X rocket would be ideal for the multiple missions to the moon that would be required. Perhaps less so for a long-term mission to Mars.

    There's a long-term experiment just finished on Hawaii:

    http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-w...tion-in-hawaii

    Leave a comment:


  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Can you imagine a kilt in space?
    Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase grabbing a moon

    Leave a comment:


  • DietCokeMan
    replied
    The super moon last week so close you could eat it!

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Everything you want to launch from the moon you have to transport to the moon first since mining prospects are minimal. So you still have to get everything to the moon from Earth which is the step we want to avoid... we have to launch stuff from Earth, land it on the moon, assemble it and launch it from the moon.

    Or you can launch it from Earth ready-built on top of a large re-usable rocket like SpaceX are working on and cut the moon out of the equation entirely.
    Or build it in orbit, which makes a lot more sense as the main part of the craft that goes to Mars doesn't also have to handle launch or landing on Earth.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Everything you want to launch from the moon you have to transport to the moon first since mining prospects are minimal. So you still have to get everything to the moon from Earth which is the step we want to avoid... we have to launch stuff from Earth, land it on the moon, assemble it and launch it from the moon.

    Or you can launch it from Earth ready-built on top of a large re-usable rocket like SpaceX are working on and cut the moon out of the equation entirely.
    Thats why the asteroids are a better option.

    Step 1 find a C type asteroid and land on that - it will contains all the volatiles you need (Oxygen and water being the 2 main ones)

    Step 2 manœuvre asteroid in step 1 to a M type asteroid which should contain the building blocks you need to create whatever you need.

    Rinse n repeat.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    The Moon will be a very handy jumping off point for missions to Mars and asteroids.

    For a start, it has sizeable deposits of ice, which can be broken down by solar energy to Hydrogen and Oxygen.
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    And as a staging post for missions to Mars it has less gravity than Earth, so less fuel is wasted (and needs to be carried) for getting to other asteroids/planets.
    Everything you want to launch from the moon you have to transport to the moon first since mining prospects are minimal. So you still have to get everything to the moon from Earth which is the step we want to avoid... we have to launch stuff from Earth, land it on the moon, assemble it and launch it from the moon.

    Or you can launch it from Earth ready-built on top of a large re-usable rocket like SpaceX are working on and cut the moon out of the equation entirely.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    Can you imagine a kilt in space?
    stranger things have happened

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Cy9HeM8QQc

    Leave a comment:


  • sal
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    The Moon will be a very handy jumping off point for missions to Mars and asteroids.

    For a start, it has sizeable deposits of ice, which can be broken down by solar energy to Hydrogen and Oxygen.
    I could be wrong by AFAIK there are proven traces/small amounts of water, actual workable deposits are only speculations.

    The biggest problem behind space expansion/explorations is the prohibitive cost of sending materials into space from Earth. IMHO the best mid term solution to this is development of a rail-gun like magnetic launch system and long term figuring out a suitable material to make a space elevator.

    the other approach that gained some early support from eccentric billionaires was the development of mining drones that can first scout, then haul mineral rich asteroids in Earth orbit and eventually manufacture various bits in space.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X