• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More migrant mayhem in the wonderful German utopia"

Collapse

  • GB9
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    How dare the British go and talk directly to the Americans!!
    I thought we weren't allowed / back of queue? Cretinhead was pointing out we weren't invited to meet the US trade negotiators. Seems otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    ****wit...



    Why would there be an EU leader there? And for your information, the UK is still part of the EU
    How dare the British go and talk directly to the Americans!!

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by GB9 View Post
    Was that Boris with John Kerry? And not an EU leader to be seen. No longer of importance to the US without the UK.
    ****wit...

    Johnson, holding the press conference in the Foreign Office
    Why would there be an EU leader there? And for your information, the UK is still part of the EU

    Leave a comment:


  • GB9
    replied
    Was that Boris with John Kerry? And not an EU leader to be seen. No longer of importance to the US without the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    ...
    The Tories made a big mistake voting Michael Gove and Andrea Leadsome out, as they would have put a stop to that.
    Why should they need to? It's not like we've had a referendum to stop freedom of movement.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post

    hmm looks like Boris will be vying for the UK to be top migration destination

    Boris commits to mass uncontrolled migration

    This seems to confirm that Johnson is comitted to a free trade deal with the EU, which requires freedom of movement.

    The Tories made a big mistake voting Michael Gove and Andrea Leadsome out, as they would have put a stop to that.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Can DNA Testing Determine Age?

    Conduct the DNA test, use a panel of experts to determine age, then take the median age from the tests. Send the bill to the EU.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    I bet if they went into a Tesco to buy Alcohol then they would be served as they 'look' over 25. Could do a reverse of that?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    In England and Wales they aren't allowed to do this.(There was some court case about it which some of the people I know where mouthing off about as a judge rejected such age indicators.)

    One of the reasons is that it is not definitive when markers such as wisdom teeth being fully erupted and bones fuse in each individual. So some 16 year olds have all these indicators while some 22 year olds don't. And this is only looking at the UK population who aren't malnourished.
    One of my son's friends was already 6' tall age 11 and needed to shave every morning. His antecedents were all British going back generations.

    My wife's parents registered as younger than they were so they could work longer. Some of the other refugee families of the Eighties reduced the age of their children to allow for longer education.

    Originally posted by Andy2 View Post
    it can't be true
    Islam is a religion of peace.
    Non sequitur. It can be true even if Islam is a religion of peace. Which it might be, as more than 99% of Muslims haven't tried to attack anyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    hmm looks like Boris will be vying for the UK to be top migration destination

    Boris commits to mass uncontrolled migration


    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    it can't be true
    Islam is a religion of peace.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Though one does wonder why they don't err on the side of caution and have a 14+ segregated provision.
    This would lead to real young kids who aren't lying being abused.

    They just put them in foster homes and leave the foster parents to cope with different aged kids including one of those "teenagers".

    One of the issues anyway is that some kids in care regardless of where they are from are promiscuous because they want the attention.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Surely there must be ways of telling a young person's age, wisdom teeth at 18 (?), and even more so a pelvis bone that fuses between 18 and 20.

    If the EU authorities, in their obsession with importing ever more young immigrants, claim it's impossible to cheaply and practically age a young person to within the nearest year, they're taking the outright mick!
    In England and Wales they aren't allowed to do this.(There was some court case about it which some of the people I know where mouthing off about as a judge rejected such age indicators.)

    One of the reasons is that it is not definitive when markers such as wisdom teeth being fully erupted and bones fuse in each individual. So some 16 year olds have all these indicators while some 22 year olds don't. And this is only looking at the UK population who aren't malnourished.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Can't you chop a leg off and count the rings?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Surely there must be ways of telling a young person's age, wisdom teeth at 18 (?), and even more so a pelvis bone that fuses between 18 and 20.

    If the EU authorities, in their obsession with importing ever more young immigrants, claim it's impossible to cheaply and practically age a young person to within the nearest year, they're taking the outright mick!
    unfortunately I believe all those indicators are mucked up by malnutrition.

    Though one does wonder why they don't err on the side of caution and have a 14+ segregated provision.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X