
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: It could be U(KIP)
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "It could be U(KIP)"
Collapse
-
"Majority slashed by UKIP"? Well, no, actually - their majority increased in percentage terms. So did UKIP's, but both increases were almost wholly at the expense of the Tories
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postits immoral for people to own more than one house and rent it out to people. they should be forced to give them to the tenants
I Know Mauve Monkey & the Squirrel bother tell me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rl4engc View PostPaying perfectly healthy people to sit on their arses all day is immoral, ergo ALL parties should clamp down on it.
Of course Labour won't, as they'd be shafting their core voters.
I Know Mauve Monkey & the Squirrel bother tell me.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostLidl don't make suits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6TywtwQmLA
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostYou're saying he's a snob for not shopping at Lidl?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostExpecting people living on benefits to vote to reduce benefits makes you as daft as them
Of course Labour won't, as they'd be shafting their core voters.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rl4engc View PostIn the case of scroungers, this is why they vote Labour as paradoxically, they're the party most likely to preserve their weekly pay for doing nowt.
Or so they thought. But the point is nearly everyone votes in their self-interest. Expecting people living on benefits to vote to reduce benefits makes you as daft as them
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
My ex-mrs had the same puzzled look on her face on our wedding day. like WTF.
Leave a comment:
-
My ex-mrs had the same puzzled look on her face on our wedding day. like WTF.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Sep 8 08:56
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 22:44
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 10:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Sep 4 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
- When agencies sink with your contractor invoice: a legal guide Sep 2 17:14
- Reeves ‘to raise VAT registration threshold to £100,000’ Sep 1 06:37
Leave a comment: