• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Should divorced wives stop sponging?"

Collapse

  • MyUserName
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Woman with skirt up run faster than man with trousers down.

    HTH
    The voice of experience?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Woman with skirt up run faster than man with trousers down.

    HTH
    Even if she wear high heel?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Woman with skirt up run faster than man with trousers down.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    sexist! next you will be saying Black men run faster.
    Than women? Very true

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    I agree, on average women are better at this than men, it's biological much like men can run faster and are stronger than women, (again on average).
    sexist! next you will be saying Black men run faster.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I think we're so obsessed with equality these days, that we confuse "everyone's equal" with "everyone's the same". Saying "X is better than Y at Z" is mis-construed as "X is better than Y", making a joke about someone who is black is misconstrued as making a joke about someone being black, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Unix
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why is suggesting that the gender which has evolved to rear young would be better at that role, is on a par with saying that gender shouldn't do arbitrary activities?

    Poor comparison.
    I agree, on average women are better at this than men, it's biological much like men can run faster and are stronger than women, (again on average).

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    It's more sexist to assume the woman should look after the children, that's on par with telling women not to drive
    Why is suggesting that the gender which has evolved to rear young would be better at that role, is on a par with saying that gender shouldn't do arbitrary activities?

    Poor comparison.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    read the story he is paying £40K in child maintenance and £30k in spousal maintenance.
    I think my butler pays that much.

    £70k a year tax free is not enough to enable one to bath nightly in champers these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Unix View Post
    If the divorcees have no kids then yes, the husband should not have to pay anything to the wife. When kids are involved then the appropriate child maintenance payments should be made.
    read the story he is paying £40K in child maintenance and £30k in spousal maintenance. His Argument is she needs to get a job before he retires because he won't be able to keep her after that.

    Note the 10 year old is with the mother, the older kid is at boarding school. Its not like she can't plan to retrain.

    Its interesting that many of the posters piled in and declared it unreasonable that she got a job having been kept in relative luxury for years.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    I reckon my only chance for financial independence is to marry a woman who's already screwed her ex-husband out of a fortune, and then murder/cherish her depending on how things go.

    So I'm against it.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by NickyBoy View Post
    This forum is a spotters guide for dysfunctional men.
    ftfy.

    Oh and,

    Leave a comment:


  • NickyBoy
    replied
    This thread is a spotters guide for dysfunctional men.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I am not sure that women are suitable to be CUK mods though...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
    It's more sexist to assume the woman should look after the children, that's on par with telling women not to drive
    Indeed. Assuming women are only good to look after children and should not be working is incredibly sexist.

    I am not sure that women are suitable to be CUK mods though...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X