• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "cyclists become most indignant if you hit them?"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    The usual CUK extrapolation. A few cyclists are a pain
    Depends where you live. On the narrow country roads round here, with villages that have parked cars, I'd say 99.999% of cyclists are a bloody nuisance. So many go in groups with little space between them and instead of needing a clear 8ft to overtake you need 30 ft or more. Have been stuck behind them on single track roads where one cannot overtake even if nothing is coming the other way.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    You lot are no fun, I was going to play indignant poster!

    blooming cyclists paying no road fund and using our roads!
    Especially fun during L2B.....

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    WMSS:





    You lot are no fun, I was going to play indignant poster!

    blooming cyclists paying no road fund and using our roads!

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by brillopad View Post
    i'm amazed your post has gone this long without some idiot pointing out that road tax was abolished in 1937. And replaced with vehicle excise duty.
    WMSS:

    Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
    i think that was nick's point...

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    I think that was Nick's point...

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    I'm quite impressed that the thread has got this far without some ignoramus hooting about road tax
    its VED!

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    I'm quite impressed that the thread has got this far without some ignoramus hooting about road tax
    I'm amazed your post has gone this long without some idiot pointing out that road tax was abolished in 1937. And replaced with vehicle excise duty.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    I'm quite impressed that the thread has got this far without some ignoramus hooting about road tax

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    75%

    I thought DUI rules were the same and pavements had bylaws which they do.

    http://www.theguardian.com/environme...vement-offence

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    M ycycling pal got 1 first try.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Millions of them where I work (it's probably worse then Holland although admittedly I'm only 30 minutes from the border) but they are, in the majority, well behaved and are well catered for:




    They don't ride though:

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    But riding 2 abreast is allowed
    Sorry I added "Like all legislation, the highway code is full of ambiguities like 'use a cycle lane if it is there but it's not compulsory' "but I couldn't have saved it.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Here we are

    UK Road Cycling Laws and Rules Explained: Cycling Two Abreast

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by tractor View Post
    The rider on the right of each pair could not by definition, have been keeping to the left.
    But riding 2 abreast is allowed

    Leave a comment:


  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by Bunk View Post
    How is this so difficult to understand? They were 2 abreast (which is not "more than two abreast") and were on the left.
    The rider on the right of each pair could not by definition, have been keeping to the left.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X