Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Perhaps because of the general trend this is being interpreted as a negative attitude from me but I can assure you as not. Take a look on the references thread
My two main issues for me are the actual practicality and worth of these checks and whether there is a trend driving this?
Totally agree with the approach of cooperation to get to the end game.
I would prefer to do these references at point of offer too. I am cashing in good will credits to get them and if the role doesn't come off it's myself that has to deal with repeated requests of peers/past-workers not the requestor.
You look for malice, I just look for incompetence / unforeseen circumstances....
+1 If more people applied this common sense approach there would be a lot less agent hating going on. Would be bliss if MaysonRyan would take a leaf out of Eek's book. He would be a lot happier.
I should add the roles I go for are Programme Director/Manager level so routinely carry large budget and change responsibility. Perhaps that is driving some of this.
I am at Director/Senior Management level also and IMO references are still irrelevant until offer stage, not at application stage.
In respect of Peer / Client Testimonials ( which, rightly or wrongly, I think of as different to References ), these can be viewed on either my LinkedIn profile and/or my company website : a link to both is on my CV.
They may well just being being over diligent in background checking rather than phishing, I can't comment on what this particular agencies' driver is, but I still think it is not appropriate at submission stage to demand "line manager references".
Good luck with it anyway
Thank you, yes I have read and responded to that post.
I will get the 'Testimonial Form' completed by a trusted peer and send that on with the agency confirmation letters.
I just wonder what is driving this as I am not convinced it is phishing.
A process has been created to meet an ISO standard and win the contract with the clientco.
That process has to be followed regardless of how easy / practical it is.....
You look for malice, I just look for incompetence / unforeseen circumstances....
I can see what how that might be the case but should have mentioned this agency is the one I used for my last assignment of 12 months!
I recently got offered a role which was subsequently canned before I started. Same request from a different agency. I got them two personal references from peers and they have not been contacted since for leads or work from the agency.
I think the agents are serious about the background checking. Perhaps the clients are asking them to do more.
I should add the roles I go for are Programme Director/Manager level so routinely carry large budget and change responsibility. Perhaps that is driving some of this.
Leave a comment: