Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Was it something that that you were responsible for that went wrong? If so then I'd be inclined to fix it as a gesture of goodwill as a point of principle (as an aside, mistakes rectified on your own time is good for IR35).
If it was pre-arranged that you could bill for it (agreed in writing) and the time was substantial (which it was) then go right ahead and bill for it. I'd suggest a half day if it was done and dusted in 3 hours or a whole day if you were on standby for the whole duration. If you don't bill then they will start expecting you to work ad-hoc without getting paid.
That's my opinion, there are lots of others offered here. Good luck choosing.
Nope. None of my doing. Badly planned client project that has run over....
client asked if I was willing to be available to help with something important this weekend if the need arose. I said yeh OK and said if it didnt take long no worries, but would it be acceptable to bill if it was substantial. Client agreed in email that yes I could book time.
Was it something that that you were responsible for that went wrong? If so then I'd be inclined to fix it as a gesture of goodwill as a point of principle (as an aside, mistakes rectified on your own time is good for IR35).
If it was pre-arranged that you could bill for it (agreed in writing) and the time was substantial (which it was) then go right ahead and bill for it. I'd suggest a half day if it was done and dusted in 3 hours or a whole day if you were on standby for the whole duration. If you don't bill then they will start expecting you to work ad-hoc without getting paid.
That's my opinion, there are lots of others offered here. Good luck choosing.
Whats the difference? At one point I was out and about and had to make a detour home to dial in to sort something.
The difference is you asked for opinions on a simple situation problem that affects only you and did not tell us the in's and outs of the exact situation on which to make your decision for you. HTH
Ermm... Aren't we rather missing the point here? Permies get weekends off. Contractors either have working days or non-working days.
As I said at the top of the thread, you've done work, you charge for it. You're not in business for free, apart from anything else it's against your resonsibilities as a company direcotr.
If you're entitled to bill for a full day but are a bit uncomfortable doing that, bill for half and make the client know how much of a favour you've done him :-)
NLUK - I bet I dont spend as long on it as you do on this forum every day being negative, having a go at people, and generally acting like a miserable git. :-)
(But I do love you really !)
I bet you don't but at least I can make an informed decision for myself once in a blue moon.
Leave a comment: