• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Approaching companies about possibility of changing perm role to contract"

Collapse

  • philgo
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    We are also going to have to be to differ on that one.
    on another post then as this is not the topic. All I'm saying is let's see what OP gets as answers. It 's also very naif to think that this is only a question of inside/outside role where it can be also a question of headcount / recruitment strategy for the company

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by philgo View Post

    Indeed it appears difficult to change a contract terms from a perm to outside / inside contract role. It's also a different headcount for the company. Then I however think that naivity is sometimes very good in business as it usually allows you to think out of the box and get huge benefits. So I'm curious to hear feedback from the naiv OP's question.
    We are also going to have to be to differ on that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • philgo
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    I certainly don't read that in to it. It's a possibility but the simplicity of the question tells me not.

    This statement explains his thinking..



    He's just wondering if he could convince an employer with a perm job open to take him on as an outside contractor instead. That shows a level of naivity at best. If that was the case and it can be done then it would be standard practice for us all to apply for every perm job and do the same... but it's not and they won't.
    Indeed it appears difficult to change a contract terms from a perm to outside / inside contract role. It's also a different headcount for the company. Then I however think that naivity is sometimes very good in business as it usually allows you to think out of the box and get huge benefits. So I'm curious to hear feedback from the naiv OP's question.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post

    Possibly, though I think it was their wording rather than their thinking.

    From reading through the responses after questioning I think they are not looking to like for like so the OP goes in as a contractor to replace a perm position, I don't think that is what they're are thinking.
    Well we will have to beg to differ then because the wording 'I'm asking if it's worth getting them to consider whether they could fill the role quicker by changing the terms.' is as clear as it can be for me. They are asking if they'll take on a contractor instead of a perm to do the same job. All they are changing is the terms of the engagement. Not a chance that can be outside.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

    I certainly don't read that in to it. It's a possibility but the simplicity of the question tells me not.

    This statement explains his thinking..



    He's just wondering if he could convince an employer with a perm job open to take him on as an outside contractor instead. That shows a level of naivity at best. If that was the case and it can be done then it would be standard practice for us all to apply for every perm job and do the same... but it's not and they won't.
    Possibly, though I think it was their wording rather than their thinking.

    From reading through the responses after questioning I think they are not looking to like for like so the OP goes in as a contractor to replace a perm position, I don't think that is what they're are thinking.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post

    Isn't the OP thinking of pitching/bidding for the work? Filling a capacity gap until the permie found?
    I certainly don't read that in to it. It's a possibility but the simplicity of the question tells me not.

    This statement explains his thinking..

    I'm asking if it's worth getting them to consider whether they could fill the role quicker by changing the terms.
    He's just wondering if he could convince an employer with a perm job open to take him on as an outside contractor instead. That shows a level of naivity at best. If that was the case and it can be done then it would be standard practice for us all to apply for every perm job and do the same... but it's not and they won't.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    For some reason no one has stated the obvious here. A perm role cannot become an outside contract. If they are converting a role it has to be inside. It's the whole point of IR35.

    There 'could' be a way of doing it but if the OP thinks a perm role can become outside then I suspect it's going to be too difficult for them.
    Isn't the OP thinking of pitching/bidding for the work? Filling a capacity gap until the permie found?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    For some reason no one has stated the obvious here. A perm role cannot become an outside contract. If they are converting a role it has to be inside. It's the whole point of IR35.

    There 'could' be a way of doing it but if the OP thinks a perm role can become outside then I suspect it's going to be too difficult for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • philgo
    replied
    Originally posted by data001 View Post

    Yes, precisely those that I've seen listed for a while but are still unfilled, I've seen more than a few recently.
    does not hurt to try I guess - let us know how you get on !

    Leave a comment:


  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by data001 View Post

    Yes, precisely those that I've seen listed for a while but are still unfilled, I've seen more than a few recently.
    I admire that, you would almost become a consultancy which is the way forward really for contracting. Good luck. Let us know how you get on.

    Leave a comment:


  • data001
    replied
    Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Post

    Are you referring to roles you have seen advertised which haven't been filled for a period of time, so you think you may be able to help out?
    If so it's not such a bad idea especially if you can go direct to the end client. If they have a need and a project which has to be done then they may be agreeable.
    Yes, precisely those that I've seen listed for a while but are still unfilled, I've seen more than a few recently.

    Leave a comment:


  • data001
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post

    There's no harm in asking.
    Is this direct with the end client, or via an agency?
    Either one, I was asking hypothetically.

    Leave a comment:


  • GregRickshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by data001 View Post
    Is it worth doing this? Has anyone tried doing this, any luck?

    I see a lot of perm roles offered and I would be interested if they were contract ideally outside IR35.
    Are you referring to roles you have seen advertised which haven't been filled for a period of time, so you think you may be able to help out?
    If so it's not such a bad idea especially if you can go direct to the end client. If they have a need and a project which has to be done then they may be agreeable.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by data001 View Post
    I'm asking if it's worth getting them to consider whether they could fill the role quicker by changing the terms.
    There's no harm in asking.
    Is this direct with the end client, or via an agency?

    Leave a comment:


  • Snooky
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    How long have you been contracting?
    What is your skillset?
    Why would a company want to hire you as an outside IR35 contractor for a role they have already effectively declared as being inside?
    If they were struggling to fill it on a permie basis, possibly. But then they'd probably be advertising it already as contract/perm

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X