• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Security Clearance

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Security Clearance"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    I'm with Cojak on this. What we do (or did, in my case) is largely apply learned knowledge to a new client situation. The underlying framework may be consistent but it's how you apply it and how you sell it to the client's staff that is the hard part. Reusing your accumulated collateral is the only sensible way to do it., but obviously that collateral has to be anonymised.

    Just for example, costing a service design for a proposal is the really tricky bit. I'm not about to re-invent my proven algorithms every time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post

    As a BA that’s my core, but I’m very careful to remove any metadata, logo’s and named references to ANY process work I reuse (my previous client is always ACME LTD…). I even bring in my own laptop in and use it tethered to my phone if necessary.

    I have a whole folder library of this cleansed stuff. I create the updated first draft on my laptop and send it via myco’s work email to the client - that way they can’t say that I’d sent anything ‘out’. I just send stuff in and badge for the client.

    I’ve seen experienced contractors get into very hot water with this while I walked away from projects squeaky clean.

    It’s not hard to do - it just takes a little forethought and application.
    forethought and application is lacking in contractors these days.
    But you're quite right. I also use my own templates where I can (A. They're usually better than the clients, and B. all old client references are removed already)

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    it's not their work you're emailing in though. In this scenario it's a solution from another client. Other client might not be so happy, and maybe that's why current client got upset as they realized that OP will steal their work as well.
    As a BA that’s my core, but I’m very careful to remove any metadata, logo’s and named references to ANY process work I reuse (my previous client is always ACME LTD…). I even bring in my own laptop in and use it tethered to my phone if necessary.

    I have a whole folder library of this cleansed stuff. I create the updated first draft on my laptop and send it via myco’s work email to the client - that way they can’t say that I’d sent anything ‘out’. I just send stuff in and badge for the client.

    I’ve seen experienced contractors get into very hot water with this while I walked away from projects squeaky clean.

    It’s not hard to do - it just takes a little forethought and application.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    it's not their work you're emailing in though. In this scenario it's a solution from another client. Other client might not be so happy, and maybe that's why current client got upset as they realized that OP will steal their work as well.
    The best case scenario is that it was incredibly poor judgement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post

    Really?

    Virtually every single organisation regardless of sector I've done contracts for state that you can't use personal email addresses for their work.

    With the few organisations that have allowed me to use one of my limited company email addresses I've been warned that they if requested they have the right to audit it.
    it's not their work you're emailing in though. In this scenario it's a solution from another client. Other client might not be so happy, and maybe that's why current client got upset as they realized that OP will steal their work as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    never been told that.... If I was I would ask why they don't simply block attachments
    Most of the value I bring is in the architecture and patterns I've used previously
    Really?

    Virtually every single organisation regardless of sector I've done contracts for state that you can't use personal email addresses for their work.

    With the few organisations that have allowed me to use one of my limited company email addresses I've been warned that they if requested they have the right to audit it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    never been told that.... If I was I would ask why they don't simply block attachments
    Most of the value I bring is in the architecture and patterns I've used previously
    They don't block attachments as there are some situations where you have to deal with an outside source who sends attachments.

    However you should be aware that every single email is monitored.

    Don't understand why people use their mobile phone. (It clearly breaches the rules but you are less likely to get caught.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    They don't go into specifics but mailing documents to/from a work email address is a big no-no.
    never been told that.... If I was I would ask why they don't simply block attachments
    Most of the value I bring is in the architecture and patterns I've used previously

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by Lance View Post

    really?

    I've done loads of training for finance companies, and not once have I been told I cannot bring other companies solutions to help them. All data protection training is focused on GDPR and protecting their own IP, not someone else's IP.
    Maybe protection and lenders work differently to high street banks.
    They don't go into specifics but mailing documents to/from a work email address is a big no-no.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    One of the very first things you do when joining a bank is to undergo hours of training that make it very clear you do not do things like this.
    really?

    I've done loads of training for finance companies, and not once have I been told I cannot bring other companies solutions to help them. All data protection training is focused on GDPR and protecting their own IP, not someone else's IP.
    Maybe protection and lenders work differently to high street banks.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    What is bizarre here... Despite any 'rules' that may or may not be in place....
    No matter where I've worked, if I have a solution for a problem, the client doesn't give a flying fig if it's something I've used with another client.

    As long as no actual IP of the old client is in the document this should be a non-issue. Even if there was any IP I wouldn't expect to do more than delete it. There's more to this than is being said. Not that it matters for SC



    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by neilandersonhq View Post
    ​​​​​​
    I think banks want to play safe and avoid all risks. They took the maximum strict action they could take to avoid all risks.
    One of the very first things you do when joining a bank is to undergo hours of training that make it very clear you do not do things like this.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by neilandersonhq View Post
    Thanks for your response. Yes, I am a contractor. Some times in your life you make a silly mistake and regret for your whole life.
    Out of interest has this prevented you from working in financial services?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by neilandersonhq View Post
    Thanks for your response. I will disclose it in the form.

    It was a vendor provided solution, the new client was using the same vendor and there we faced the exact same problem. I copied the solution In a pdf file and mailed it to my new email address. The solution contained my old client name.
    ​​​​​​
    I think banks want to play safe and avoid all risks. They took the maximum strict action they could take to avoid all risks.

    Just a follow up question, the incident happened on my second month with the client. I couldn’t complete my two months. I was looking at an old sc form online and they suggested to only include employments where you worked for more than three months. Is that correct?
    When I worked on the desk at an American bank one of the sales people was about to quit and decided he wanted to take his contacts with him.

    This genius who was probably on the best part of £500k with bonus thought that if he mailed the list as white text on a white background to his personal email address then he wouldn't get caught...

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by neilandersonhq View Post

    Just a follow up question, the incident happened on my second month with the client. I couldn’t complete my two months. I was looking at an old sc form online and they suggested to only include employments where you worked for more than three months. Is that correct?
    If it's an old one and it doesn't say that on the new one then I'd guess no.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X