Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Going back to old client, now inside IR35?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
Because (from the OP's first post on this thread.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Why aren't you leaving to go find yourself outside work? You'll be taking a 35+% cut in income unless they are increasing your inside rate? I get what Eek says but to be so hooked on a client with these risks (or not it seems) just doesn't seem the right thing to do unless there is a very good reason. We are contractors, we move clients regularly so this just seems a good time to be a contractor.
Originally posted by LouC View PostThe market's busy, but a lot of the jobs seem very niche, and the ones I could apply for are a lower rate than my old gig.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LouC View PostThank you everyone, you have pretty much just given voice to all the arguments going round my head! The bank do use a few different agencies (and that was offered to me in April), so that could work. I'll see what they come back to me with, if anything. Thanks again!
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you everyone, you have pretty much just given voice to all the arguments going round my head! The bank do use a few different agencies (and that was offered to me in April), so that could work. I'll see what they come back to me with, if anything. Thanks again!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
Interesting. I noticed you'd said it before but didn't think it was as black and white as that. Do you think HMRC will go back to other forums of investigating? Seb indicated investigations came out of changes to the account, missed tax, closing company etc. If, for example, the OP manages to get back in to the bank via a new agency, do you think there is still risks like the old days or is this change of agent pretty much as safe as can be?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View Post
I will go back to the advice I hinted at earlier that S3 used while sorting out the public sector changes - use a different agency.
The paper trail HMRC has only goes as far as agencies it doesn't extend further than that - so new agency, nothing for HMRC to work from.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View Post
I was having a tongue in cheek moment. I know social media lacks nuance sometimes but I did think that was blindingly obvious.
Unless you are accusing me of being a pscont sockie.
Not Pscont but something sounding similar maybe?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
But I believe HMRC get interested when you do something out of the norm. Could shutting a PSC increase the chance of them having a sniff?
Unless you are accusing me of being a pscont sockie.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
But as I pointed out the OP is not part of this crowd. She has started a new gig which is inside, same gig she did was outside. She didn't swap from inside to outside at the time of the legislation.
The paper trail HMRC has only goes as far as agencies it doesn't extend further than that - so new agency, nothing for HMRC to work from.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mogga71 View Post
Agree with all of this. if HMRC suddenly started investigating all outside->inside gigs after their initial 'wont come after you' statements there would be hell to pay (literally)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lance View Post
Do HMRC not pursue previous owners of companies for avoided personal taxes? That is great news. I'll just close down and restart my company every few years then. Thanks for the tip.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: