Originally posted by Lance
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "End client ending contract and changed their minds to pay the notice period payment"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Bee View Post
The contracts have terms and termination conditions between the contractor and the agency to protect both parts, the Agency has another contract with terms and termination conditions with the client. Don't tell me that in the UK a lawyer or a court does not have the power to check the contract between the Agency and the Client if necessary? If not I must conclude that looks like a 3 world country (with no offense). I presume if you won, the blame part will pay all the costs, in the UK no?
The court would the last choice because you may lose the Client but this is another long story.
A court case about B2B payments will always be a civil case.
You call it 3rd world, but it's probably the most mature legal system in the world and better at protecting wealth than almost all the others.
It is an adversarial system. Most of Europe use an inquisitorial system instead thanks to Napolean. That is why someone with a vague grasp of European law has no flipping idea about UK (or American for that matter) business laws.
You accused me of an assumption earlier (which may or may not be wrong), yet you assume an understanding of a legal system which you demonstrably don't have.
As for costs... It depends.... Like most UK law it's not cut and dry. Generally in a small claims court the costs cannot be reclaimed, but there are, as usual, exceptions. In other courts costs are usually awarded to the winner of the case.
IANAL
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostI believe the critical issue here is the delay in returning the laptop. How long was it delayed for?
Why was it delayed?
Did the client/agent have to make some efforts to get it back?
Etc.
I hate when this happens, they come with a problem and then simply vanish.
Leave a comment:
-
I believe the critical issue here is the delay in returning the laptop. How long was it delayed for?
Why was it delayed?
Did the client/agent have to make some efforts to get it back?
Etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThe email from the client won't make a difference will it? The OP has no contractual relationship with the client so it doesn't matter what the client says they will do. That's between the client and the agent.
It also opens the possibility that his contract also says they will only get paid if the agency does. In this case they haven't so again no breach.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostTwice, impressively!
You and NLUK and the lack of ability to analyzing the problem in-depth makes me laugh.
The contracts have terms and termination conditions between the contractor and the agency to protect both parts, the Agency has another contract with terms and termination conditions with the client. Don't tell me that in the UK a lawyer or a court does not have the power to check the contract between the Agency and the Client if necessary? If not I must conclude that looks like a 3 world country (with no offense). I presume if you won, the blame part will pay all the costs, in the UK no?
The court would the last choice because you may lose the Client but this is another long story.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mattfx View PostUsually some official court paperwork is enough to prompt someone into coughing up.
In which case you're down to hoping that they don't want to pay out unnecessarily, rather than actually being right.
Leave a comment:
-
Whilst a lawyer will quickly and efficiently resolve, the costs of employing one may not justify the gains. Let's say OP is chasing down £2000 for his 5 days worked, any good lawyer is going to need to spend around an hour going over the contract and being briefed on the situation, a further hour drafting a letter and then potentially a final hour sending a response if the clientco come back.
A very conservative estimate of three hours worth of legal time would probably be somewhere in the region of £600 for someone junior. Whilst you can write that off against your CT bill, you will also have spent a fair amount of your own time chasing this. Do you really want to go to that effort and expense (including your own, valuable time which frankly you cannot put a price on) to chase a grand? (assuming that the initial £2000 figure is in the right ball park) - you may be better off focusing on the next challenge, sending some tailored applications and undertaking some training for your next desired gig.
If you don't want to get legal beagles involved, id try and raise an MCOL claim against the agency (if not opted out) and just see where you get with it. You can withdraw at any time and it only costs a few quid. Usually some official court paperwork is enough to prompt someone into coughing up.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostGenerally, you aren't paid because there is no contractual requirement to pay you.Last edited by Bee; 13 September 2017, 16:49.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bee View PostOnly an idiot would work in notice period knowing that was not going to be paid.
If you don't have a signed timesheet you don't get paid.
If you don't work during your notice period, you don't get paid.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: