• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "State of the Market"

Collapse

  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by Bluenose View Post

    5 days a week onsite in some sort of god awful market town where there is nowhere decent to sleep isnt what I had in mind
    Not even for the defence of the realm? You work shy deserter!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bluenose
    replied
    Originally posted by financial analyst View Post
    Hoping the news that the government has agreed to spend more on defence might present opportunities for some of us.
    5 days a week onsite in some sort of god awful market town where there is nowhere decent to sleep isnt what I had in mind

    Leave a comment:


  • financial analyst
    replied
    Hoping the news that the government has agreed to spend more on defence might present opportunities for some of us.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2dzlrm0jno

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by TheDude View Post

    A bit?

    Running a tax efficient limited company wasn't enough for some of the people I worked with. They engaged in questionable tax avoidance schemes whilst bragging about their share in a light aircraft, sports car, ski holiday and that every day was bonus day.

    Then they got busted.
    not before f**king it up for the rest of us.
    greedy barstewards.
    and still a lot of them about, as can be seen from some attitudes on here.
    GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post
    IR35 coming in was before my time but some contractors were a bit out there with their tax affairs. I suspect that was the main reason it came in.
    A bit?

    Running a tax efficient limited company wasn't enough for some of the people I worked with. They engaged in questionable tax avoidance schemes whilst bragging about their share in a light aircraft, sports car, ski holiday and that every day was bonus day.

    Then they got busted.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by willendure View Post

    Aye yes - I think that is what happened as IR35 evolved under the tories. Their mates didn't like the competition so made some lovely party donations and had the problem dealt with.

    Especially Sunak, that guy was as bent as a nail!
    just like all Tory's

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

    a cause of the legislation? - remove consultancies' competition ...
    Aye yes - I think that is what happened as IR35 evolved under the tories. Their mates didn't like the competition so made some lovely party donations and had the problem dealt with.

    Especially Sunak, that guy was as bent as a nail!

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post
    IR35 coming in was before my time but some contractors were a bit out there with their tax affairs. I suspect that was the main reason it came in.
    Supposedly it was never meant to target genuine contractors such as IT contractors. There was a problem with people evading tax by incorporating in silly situations - the one I read about was a car wash where each of the "valeting contractors" who worked there had their own ltd.

    Over time the law evolved to cash in on IT contractors as a juicy target. Just like Reeves is about to cash in on the entire middle class as a juicy target. Except of course it isn't cashing in so much as crashing out the entire economy. I hate Rachel Reeves, asside from being a miserable cow, she must live in some weird elitist socialist fantasy. At least Raynors socialist dreams are over!

    Leave a comment:


  • oliverson
    replied
    Originally posted by oliverson View Post
    Well, I didn't get too 'attached' to Tuesday's interview but still, end of play Friday and f**, all feedback. Never used to be like this.
    Well, as suspected, they went with the other candidate. Very surprised really as interviews really don't go much better than that one.

    The search goes on.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by ensignia View Post
    Averse.
    Achorus

    Leave a comment:


  • ensignia
    replied
    Averse.

    Leave a comment:


  • krytonsheep
    replied
    Originally posted by ShandyDrinker View Post
    I never understood when you'd get into a place and meet a contractor who'd been there longer than most of the permies. Often permitractors who'd then say "what's IR35?"
    What I saw was some kind of osmosis of permies to contractors. Permies start to see the odd contractor appearing in their company, find out there's more money to be made doing the same job, then if they're not risk averse will switch sides.

    Over time there's so many contractors and contracts available, even risk averse permies start to switch sides in large numbers. In the tech industry it was also the best way to earn more without having to move to management. So it almost became a career progression. The employers would treat the contractors the same as permies, but had the benefit of being a lot easier to get rid of. No employment tribunals, sick days etc. What was happening was disguised employment hence HMRC stepping trying to clamp down on it.
    Last edited by krytonsheep; Today, 08:51. Reason: spelling

    Leave a comment:


  • ShandyDrinker
    replied
    Originally posted by simes View Post

    I think these are just excuses, or at least the next 'stages' of a calendar year when 'something' is out of the way.

    Christmas, Easter, End of tax year, summer, budget, election... None of these events have offered immediate improvement in the world after their passing.
    Perhaps they are just excuses. I never used to have issues over the summer/school holidays in July/August when people said it would be quiet. Or Christmas. Or any other of the supposed quiet periods.

    However, over the last 12-18 months in particular, I've seen that hiring has fallen off a cliff and rates down significantly. When people you know that have previously got contracts relatively easily are now struggling, you know something is amiss. That's before we get to comments on this thread.

    I've said it before and I'll say it again. This is much worse than the GFC. This is worse that the downturn that was predicted post Brexit. It's worse than the lull at the start of covid.

    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    the cause of the legislation? - permitractors.
    I completely agree with this. I never understood when you'd get into a place and meet a contractor who'd been there longer than most of the permies. Often permitractors who'd then say "what's IR35?"

    Originally posted by Protagoras View Post

    a cause of the legislation? - remove consultancies' competition ...
    The cynical among us do believe that this had an impact, with massive conflicts of interest at play.


    Leave a comment:


  • SussexSeagull
    replied
    IR35 coming in was before my time but some contractors were a bit out there with their tax affairs. I suspect that was the main reason it came in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Protagoras
    replied
    Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post

    remove completion??? wtf?
    I'm getting so fed up with 'auto-correct'! Now updated.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X