• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Minimum Corporate Tax rate to be imposed on the UK"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Best of luck with that theory. Corporation tax is applied at the place of registration.
    It's not a theory, it's what been proposed for many years and was mainly blocked by the USA, which is no longer the case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    Luxembourg's won't matter if (as Biden proposed) multinationals will start paying corp tax where sales actually happen, since relatively feck all sold in Luxembourg they might even close their eyes on their corp tax levels, it's not clear why would a minimum tax be necessary if the plan is so good.
    Best of luck with that theory. Corporation tax is applied at the place of registration. And just for good measure, Amazon make sure they make a loss (or profits so small they're barely worth taxing) in high-value markets. The best governments can do is impose a sales tax, but the customer pays all of that.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Luxembourg and Monaco don't need to worry as they're on the "Board". I remember when Switzerland got hammered when the US got tough on offshore financial centres, Luxembourg got a free pass.
    Luxembourg's won't matter if (as Biden proposed) multinationals will start paying corp tax where sales actually happen, since relatively feck all sold in Luxembourg they might even close their eyes on their corp tax levels, it's not clear why would a minimum tax be necessary if the plan is so good.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Bring back Trump!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Luxembourg and Monaco don't need to worry as they're on the "Board". I remember when Switzerland got hammered when the US got tough on offshore financial centres, Luxembourg got a free pass.
    What about https://nltimes.nl/2021/03/09/nether...gest-tax-haven and https://www.europaunited.eu/ireland-...est-tax-haven/ ???

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Luxembourg and Monaco don't need to worry as they're on the "Board". I remember when Switzerland got hammered when the US got tough on offshore financial centres, Luxembourg got a free pass.

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied
    I wonder if the billionaire's resident in Monaco and Luxembourg are quaking in their designer boots yet?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post

    There's just no accounting for them!
    They probably chlorinate it first!

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    But strange they like the AZ vaccine!
    There's just no accounting for them!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    And according to the article, the US hates it now as well.
    But strange they like the AZ vaccine!

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by _V_ View Post
    Europe hates the idea of an island nation close to the mainland, with ultra low tax rates, used as a loophole to attract global companies to their shore.
    And according to the article, the US hates it now as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by _V_ View Post
    Europe hates the idea of an island nation close to the mainland, with ultra low tax rates, used as a loophole to attract global companies to their shore.

    Oh, unless that place is Ireland of course.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpor...lic_of_Ireland



    I will have a double Irish please.
    You need to add a Danish in there to get the full flavour!

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied
    Europe hates the idea of an island nation close to the mainland, with ultra low tax rates, used as a loophole to attract global companies to their shore.

    Oh, unless that place is Ireland of course.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpor...lic_of_Ireland

    Ireland's "headline" corporation tax rate is 12.5%, however, foreign multinationals pay an aggregate § Effective tax rate (ETR) of 2.2–4.5% on global profits "shifted" to Ireland, via Ireland's global network of bilateral tax treaties. These lower effective tax rates are achieved by a complex set of Irish base erosion and profit shifting ("BEPS") tools which handle the largest BEPS flows in the world (e.g. the Double Irish as used by Google and Facebook, the Single Malt as used by Microsoft and Allergan, and Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets as used by Accenture, and by Apple post Q1 2015).[1]
    I will have a double Irish please.

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied
    A lot of people think there is no tax on corporations in the Cayman Islands.

    There is corporation tax there on all companies.

    It's just the rate is 0%

    I guess the UK can impose the same lower limit.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    Aren't they talking about rates for multinational trading corporations...?
    Isn't that the whole point of Singapore on Thames?

    Perhaps they should rename it the "Grimsby on Thames" strategy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X