Reply to: UKIP Councillor wants death penalty for all remainers

[Whorty]

Only for those who take the Guardian though.

I hope you use some good lube and get your sphincter nice and relaxed when you "take the guardian"

[shaunbhoy]

How very "la-di-da Gunner Graham"!

You stupid boy Pike!!

[Zigenare]

Only for "those who take the Guardian" though.

How very "la-di-da Gunner Graham"!

[shaunbhoy]

There is a correlation between brexit and mental health

Only for those who take the Guardian though.

[Eirikur]

He's obviously a loony.

There is a correlation between brexit and mental health, it seems quite a few of the brexiteers here are affected

Austerity created this mental-health crisis. Brexit has sent it into overdrive | Frances Ryan | Opinion | The Guardian

[Bean]

You're right, how dare I mention topic of this thread, when you want to derail it into being about you.

Hey WTFH - is the post quoted below an example of me derailing the thread and 'making it about me', or someone else doing so?

He's obviously a loony.

Perhaps have a word with NAT to stick to the topic, if that's what your desired outcome is?

[Zigenare]

He's obviously a loony.

Judged against you, he's sane!

[Bean]

Does it really matter?

Nothing in 'General' matters.

[NotAllThere]

You're right, how dare I mention topic of this thread, when you want to derail it into being about you.

He's obviously a loony.

[Zigenare]

On page 1, other people mentioned me and I entered the thread and posted about the topic...

This was before you went off on an armchair psychiatrist diagnosis, of which I merely asked if you were a qualified person (as others have done in the past) and removed/snipped your amateur irrelevant non-qualified remarks.

Now, the thread is still getting derailed because of your inability to say 'it's a fair cop guv'.

Please, keep digging though, as with the other thread, it's amusing

Does it really matter?

[Bean]

You're right, how dare I mention topic of this thread, when you want to derail it into being about you.

On page 1, other people mentioned me and I entered the thread and posted about the topic...

This was before you went off on an armchair psychiatrist diagnosis, of which I merely asked if you were a qualified person (as others have done in the past) and removed/snipped your amateur irrelevant non-qualified remarks.

Now, the thread is still getting derailed because of your inability to say 'it's a fair cop guv'.

Please, keep digging though, as with the other thread, it's amusing

[WTFH]

More whataboutery - nothing to do with "paranoid schizophrenia with multiple personalities"

HTH BIDI

You're right, how dare I mention topic of this thread, when you want to derail it into being about you.

[Bean]

Tell me how saying "I'm not a psychiatrist" is "Whataboutery"

It's not. The whataboutery is all the guff immediately below:

There’s a bunch of people who need psychiatric help. They believe that anyone who democratically disagrees with them should be killed, or that politicians should be killed
Not only those who preach that message, but also those who vote for them - one would seriously question their mental state if they believe the solution to differences of opinion is to throw your toys out the pram then justify committing murder.

Compared to your original snipped post;

If I was a psychiatrist, I'd suggest paranoid schizophrenia with multiple personalities.

So........WHATABOUTERY

And then tell me what is incorrect or immoral in suggesting that people who promote, encourage and support the killing of civilians are not sane?

More whataboutery - nothing to do with "paranoid schizophrenia with multiple personalities"

HTH BIDI

[WTFH]

WHATABOUTERY.

Pertinent part of your post is bolded and confirms I was right to SNIP your pseudo-psychiatrist guff post.

So thanks

Tell me how saying "I'm not a psychiatrist" is "Whataboutery"

And then tell me what is incorrect or immoral in suggesting that people who promote, encourage and support the killing of civilians are not sane?

[Bean]

Maybe in your stupidity you hadn't noticed that this is a public forum, which means anyone who is a member can comment on any post?

Just like you do. You hypocritical moron. If you want to address just one person, use a private message. Although using PMs to abuse someone may well lead to a ban.

Maybe in your stupidity, you incorrectly thought you were WTFH (or spoke for him), since the question was asking whether or not he (specifically and only him) is a psychiatrist.

So, yes, by all means a public forum means everyone can read posts and even reply to them, but that doesn't preclude it being idiotic to respond to them, like in your case, you idiot.

HTH BIDI