• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Mr Bercow

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mr Bercow"

Collapse

  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    You've got it bad, son!

    Have a unicorn gif.



    When do we get the real unicorns? After March 29th, or do we have to wait until the transition period is over? So excited

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Whorty View Post
    Or, you're just

    I'm sure you'll get over it
    You've got it bad, son!

    Have a unicorn gif.



    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Or proffering expertise and correcting rudimentary mistakes.

    Or, you're just

    I'm sure you'll get over it

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    He's not the only one (by a long chalk)...
    Lol. Took longer than I expected before some said something along those lines.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I like Mr Bercow to be honest. I think it's something to do with me thinking he's a lucky fellow to have had a bit of Mrs Bercow rather than anything to do with his professional career though.
    He's not the only one (by a long chalk)...

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Yep, especially 2nd amendment!
    Fair enough. At least you're consistent.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    The clerks advise on legality not on how "virtuous" it is.

    Put down your spade. Clerks are not lawyers and do not advise on "legality" (else that is a very poor choice of word indeed).

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied


    Would Mitch???

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    I like Mr Bercow to be honest. I think it's something to do with me thinking he's a lucky fellow to have had a bit of Mrs Bercow rather than anything to do with his professional career though.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Well done, that is very pro-expert of you.

    The clerks advise on legality not on how "virtuous" it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    That's certainly a view. I assume you'd prefer a written constitution too.
    Yep, especially 2nd amendment!

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Speaker should not have power to decide what is up for voting, maybe only order (based on say number of signatures).
    That's certainly a view. I assume you'd prefer a written constitution too.

    I'd merely point out that curtailing the power of the Speaker is an ironic stance in light of this thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    well done that is very "virtuous" of you.

    Well done, that is very pro-expert of you.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    You seem to be in favour of circumscribing the power of the Speaker to select amendments. I think that might disrupt the parliamentary schedule somewhat.
    Speaker should not have power to decide what is up for voting, maybe only order (based on say number of signatures).

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Or proffering expertise and correcting rudimentary mistakes.

    well done that is very "virtuous" of you.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X